User talk:CamilleT - Revision history

Jpatt: Reverted edits by Mattcas132 (talk) to last revision by Jpatt

2012-03-07T01:29:01Z

Reverted edits by Mattcas132 (talk) to last revision by Jpatt

Mattcas132: asking a question

2012-03-07T01:14:18Z

asking a question

Mattcas132 at 01:13, March 7, 2012

2012-03-07T01:13:21Z

Jpatt: Reverted edits by MouseWiki (talk) to last revision by Jpatt

2011-12-14T15:31:57Z

Reverted edits by MouseWiki (talk) to last revision by Jpatt

Show changes

MouseWiki at 15:21, December 14, 2011

2011-12-14T15:21:20Z

Show changes

Jpatt: Reverted edits by SamRSC (talk) to last revision by CamilleT

2011-11-26T18:32:52Z

Reverted edits by SamRSC (talk) to last revision by CamilleT

CamilleT: Undo revision 940641 by SamRSC (talk) I have, but I find that Conservapedia is more interesting.

2011-11-26T18:27:26Z

Undo revision 940641 by SamRSC (talk) I have, but I find that Conservapedia is more interesting.

Jpatt: Reverted edits by SorryCharlie (talk) to last revision by Jpatt

2011-11-22T04:24:32Z

Reverted edits by SorryCharlie (talk) to last revision by Jpatt

SorryCharlie: Undo revision 939337 by Jpatt (talk)undo censorship

2011-11-22T04:22:57Z

Undo revision 939337 by Jpatt (talk)undo censorship

Jpatt at 04:02, November 22, 2011

2011-11-22T04:02:49Z

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 </big></big></big></center><br/>
 {{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 19:27, 24 May 2011 (EDT)}}
-why do you edit this site when it seems that it goes against everything you believe in? -[[mattcas132]]
 ==Santorum==
 We're gonna need the Dan Savage article to fill in the red link at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservative Personalities]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:01, 7 June 2011 (EDT)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 </big></big></big></center><br/>
 {{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 19:27, 24 May 2011 (EDT)}}
-why do you edit this site when it seems that it goes against everything you believe in?
+why do you edit this site when it seems that it goes against everything you believe in? -[[mattcas132]]
 ==Santorum==
 We're gonna need the Dan Savage article to fill in the red link at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservative Personalities]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:01, 7 June 2011 (EDT)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 </big></big></big></center><br/>
 {{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 19:27, 24 May 2011 (EDT)}}
+why do you edit this site when it seems that it goes against everything you believe in?
 ==Santorum==
 We're gonna need the Dan Savage article to fill in the red link at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservative Personalities]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:01, 7 June 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:24, November 22, 2011
Line 70:		Line 70:
	:I look forward to reading it. Just be sure not to disparage bystanders such as I this time, please.--[[User:CamilleT\|CamilleT]] 10:57, 29 August 2011 (EDT)		:I look forward to reading it. Just be sure not to disparage bystanders such as I this time, please.--[[User:CamilleT\|CamilleT]] 10:57, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
	::There has been a request to create the [[Pièce de résistance\|pièce de résistance]] of atheism related material at Conservapedia expeditiously. Plus, there is still some confusion on the format it will take. The pièce de résistance will take the format of an article on atheism and not an essay, although there may be a few accompanying related satirical essays that may follow. As far as the timing of the release of the article, I will not say when it will be released. It may be very soon, it may be longer. But [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SAycHK1o4 here is a video] for atheists to take into consideration. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 17:25, 3 September 2011 (EDT)		::There has been a request to create the [[Pièce de résistance\|pièce de résistance]] of atheism related material at Conservapedia expeditiously. Plus, there is still some confusion on the format it will take. The pièce de résistance will take the format of an article on atheism and not an essay, although there may be a few accompanying related satirical essays that may follow. As far as the timing of the release of the article, I will not say when it will be released. It may be very soon, it may be longer. But [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SAycHK1o4 here is a video] for atheists to take into consideration. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 17:25, 3 September 2011 (EDT)
−
−	~~== Re: your reversion of my edit to Talk:Mainpage ==~~
−
−	Tk's last edits to Conservapedia were on the same day as his demise, so Aschlafly's logic would surely apply here. This is the point that I was trying to make. Garrett Uekman had been dead for barely 24 hours before Aschlafly decided to make his absurd connection between his death and video games. His body had not even been laid to rest yet. Please explain to me how my comment was inappropriate but Andy's is somehow not. [[User:AverageJoe\|AverageJoe]] 22:49, 21 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, November 22, 2011
Line 70:		Line 70:
	:I look forward to reading it. Just be sure not to disparage bystanders such as I this time, please.--[[User:CamilleT\|CamilleT]] 10:57, 29 August 2011 (EDT)		:I look forward to reading it. Just be sure not to disparage bystanders such as I this time, please.--[[User:CamilleT\|CamilleT]] 10:57, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
	::There has been a request to create the [[Pièce de résistance\|pièce de résistance]] of atheism related material at Conservapedia expeditiously. Plus, there is still some confusion on the format it will take. The pièce de résistance will take the format of an article on atheism and not an essay, although there may be a few accompanying related satirical essays that may follow. As far as the timing of the release of the article, I will not say when it will be released. It may be very soon, it may be longer. But [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SAycHK1o4 here is a video] for atheists to take into consideration. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 17:25, 3 September 2011 (EDT)		::There has been a request to create the [[Pièce de résistance\|pièce de résistance]] of atheism related material at Conservapedia expeditiously. Plus, there is still some confusion on the format it will take. The pièce de résistance will take the format of an article on atheism and not an essay, although there may be a few accompanying related satirical essays that may follow. As far as the timing of the release of the article, I will not say when it will be released. It may be very soon, it may be longer. But [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SAycHK1o4 here is a video] for atheists to take into consideration. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 17:25, 3 September 2011 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Re: your reversion of my edit to Talk:Mainpage ==
		+
		+	Tk's last edits to Conservapedia were on the same day as his demise, so Aschlafly's logic would surely apply here. This is the point that I was trying to make. Garrett Uekman had been dead for barely 24 hours before Aschlafly decided to make his absurd connection between his death and video games. His body had not even been laid to rest yet. Please explain to me how my comment was inappropriate but Andy's is somehow not. [[User:AverageJoe\|AverageJoe]] 22:49, 21 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:32, November 26, 2011
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:27, November 26, 2011
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, November 22, 2011
Line 70:		Line 70:
	:I look forward to reading it. Just be sure not to disparage bystanders such as I this time, please.--[[User:CamilleT\|CamilleT]] 10:57, 29 August 2011 (EDT)		:I look forward to reading it. Just be sure not to disparage bystanders such as I this time, please.--[[User:CamilleT\|CamilleT]] 10:57, 29 August 2011 (EDT)
	::There has been a request to create the [[Pièce de résistance\|pièce de résistance]] of atheism related material at Conservapedia expeditiously. Plus, there is still some confusion on the format it will take. The pièce de résistance will take the format of an article on atheism and not an essay, although there may be a few accompanying related satirical essays that may follow. As far as the timing of the release of the article, I will not say when it will be released. It may be very soon, it may be longer. But [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SAycHK1o4 here is a video] for atheists to take into consideration. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 17:25, 3 September 2011 (EDT)		::There has been a request to create the [[Pièce de résistance\|pièce de résistance]] of atheism related material at Conservapedia expeditiously. Plus, there is still some confusion on the format it will take. The pièce de résistance will take the format of an article on atheism and not an essay, although there may be a few accompanying related satirical essays that may follow. As far as the timing of the release of the article, I will not say when it will be released. It may be very soon, it may be longer. But [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9SAycHK1o4 here is a video] for atheists to take into consideration. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 17:25, 3 September 2011 (EDT)
−
−	~~== Re: your reversion of my edit to Talk:Mainpage ==~~
−
−	Tk's last edits to Conservapedia were on the same day as his demise, so Aschlafly's logic would surely apply here. This is the point that I was trying to make. Garrett Uekman had been dead for barely 24 hours before Aschlafly decided to make his absurd connection between his death and video games. His body had not even been laid to rest yet. Please explain to me how my comment was inappropriate but Andy's is somehow not. [[User:AverageJoe\|AverageJoe]] 22:49, 21 November 2011 (EST)