User talk:SkipJohnson - Revision history

StephenW: wp deletions

2008-01-23T05:19:03Z

wp deletions

Fox: /* uncyclopedia */

2008-01-22T22:10:00Z

uncyclopedia

Geo.plrd: uncyclopedia

2008-01-19T02:35:26Z

uncyclopedia

Ed Poor: Pipes and SJS

2008-01-18T21:31:10Z

Pipes and SJS

Aschlafly: restored page per request

2008-01-16T23:34:26Z

restored page per request

Karajou at 09:26, January 16, 2008

2008-01-16T09:26:53Z

TK: Likely Vandal?

2007-10-13T04:31:50Z

Likely Vandal?

TK: /* Liberal evolution */

2007-10-10T03:07:16Z

Liberal evolution

TK: /* Liberal evolution */

2007-10-10T03:05:44Z

Liberal evolution

Canadarules at 01:38, October 10, 2007

2007-10-10T01:38:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, January 23, 2008
Line 62:		Line 62:
	==Edit==		==Edit==
	I'm not entirely sure on that last edit - hence the question mark; but I think that the point being made is pro-life vs pro-choice, which wouldn't really involve the financial aspects so much as the ethical/moral position. Open to discussion though. [[Image:User Fox.png\|10px]] [[User:Fox\|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Fox\|contribs]])</small> 17:10, 22 January 2008 (EST)		I'm not entirely sure on that last edit - hence the question mark; but I think that the point being made is pro-life vs pro-choice, which wouldn't really involve the financial aspects so much as the ethical/moral position. Open to discussion though. [[Image:User Fox.png\|10px]] [[User:Fox\|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Fox\|contribs]])</small> 17:10, 22 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	== wp deletions ==
		+
		+	I am interested. Shoot me an email. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW\|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW\|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW\|♣]]</sup> 00:19, 23 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, January 22, 2008
Line 59:		Line 59:

	unlocked for 24 hours [[User:Geo.plrd\|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd\|Complain!]]</sup> 21:35, 18 January 2008 (EST)		unlocked for 24 hours [[User:Geo.plrd\|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd\|Complain!]]</sup> 21:35, 18 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	==Edit==
		+	I'm not entirely sure on that last edit - hence the question mark; but I think that the point being made is pro-life vs pro-choice, which wouldn't really involve the financial aspects so much as the ethical/moral position. Open to discussion though. [[Image:User Fox.png\|10px]] [[User:Fox\|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Fox\|contribs]])</small> 17:10, 22 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, January 19, 2008
Line 55:		Line 55:

	You reverted all my work. I do not understand why. And you left my merged to [[Daniel Pipes]]. What are you trying to do? --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 16:31, 18 January 2008 (EST)		You reverted all my work. I do not understand why. And you left my merged to [[Daniel Pipes]]. What are you trying to do? --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 16:31, 18 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	== uncyclopedia ==
		+
		+	unlocked for 24 hours [[User:Geo.plrd\|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd\|Complain!]]</sup> 21:35, 18 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, January 18, 2008
Line 51:		Line 51:

	: It's OK and I've restored it. Thanks for your concern, Karajou.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 18:34, 16 January 2008 (EST)		: It's OK and I've restored it. Thanks for your concern, Karajou.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 18:34, 16 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	==Pipes==
		+
		+	You reverted all my work. I do not understand why. And you left my merged to [[Daniel Pipes]]. What are you trying to do? --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor\|Talk]]</sup> 16:31, 18 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, January 16, 2008
Line 49:		Line 49:
	==Anarcopedia==		==Anarcopedia==
	I did do the removal of the article, as I felt advertised and supported anarchy. But, under the assumption that I am wrong for doing so (and don't worry about my feelings here; I could indeed be wrong), please discuss it with Aschlafly. If he says it's OK, then it will be restored immediately. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 04:26, 16 January 2008 (EST)		I did do the removal of the article, as I felt advertised and supported anarchy. But, under the assumption that I am wrong for doing so (and don't worry about my feelings here; I could indeed be wrong), please discuss it with Aschlafly. If he says it's OK, then it will be restored immediately. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 04:26, 16 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	: It's OK and I've restored it. Thanks for your concern, Karajou.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 18:34, 16 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:26, January 16, 2008
Line 46:		Line 46:

	*We do not block people here for "likely" unless their created user name is something pretty blatant. Perhaps you can contact me, and discuss what policy is, rather than creating all this unblocking work for me? Thanks. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 00:31, 13 October 2007 (EDT)		*We do not block people here for "likely" unless their created user name is something pretty blatant. Perhaps you can contact me, and discuss what policy is, rather than creating all this unblocking work for me? Thanks. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 00:31, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Anarcopedia==
		+	I did do the removal of the article, as I felt advertised and supported anarchy. But, under the assumption that I am wrong for doing so (and don't worry about my feelings here; I could indeed be wrong), please discuss it with Aschlafly. If he says it's OK, then it will be restored immediately. [[User:Karajou\|Karajou]] 04:26, 16 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, October 13, 2007
Line 42:		Line 42:

	*In [[Sabre Toothed Tiger]] I don't see any difference between either of your versions. So don't understand the argument here. But I do understand that an Admin will be deciding who is blocked, and for what. So far I don't see anything done by either of you to warrant a block. Now you two go and place nice! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 23:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)		*In [[Sabre Toothed Tiger]] I don't see any difference between either of your versions. So don't understand the argument here. But I do understand that an Admin will be deciding who is blocked, and for what. So far I don't see anything done by either of you to warrant a block. Now you two go and place nice! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 23:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Likely Vandal? ==
		+
		+	*We do not block people here for "likely" unless their created user name is something pretty blatant. Perhaps you can contact me, and discuss what policy is, rather than creating all this unblocking work for me? Thanks. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 00:31, 13 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:07, October 10, 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Evolution is a scientific theory, it is neither liberal nor conservative, please don't politicize science. You can put the creationist view in as well but please don't present it as fact. --[[User:Canadarules\|Canadarules]] 21:38, 9 October 2007 (EDT)		Evolution is a scientific theory, it is neither liberal nor conservative, please don't politicize science. You can put the creationist view in as well but please don't present it as fact. --[[User:Canadarules\|Canadarules]] 21:38, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

−	*In [[~~Saber~~ Toothed Tiger]] I don't see any difference between either of your versions. So don't understand the argument here. But I do understand that an Admin will be deciding who is blocked, and for what. So far I don't see anything done by either of you to warrant a block. Now you two go and place nice! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 23:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)	+	*In [[Sabre Toothed Tiger]] I don't see any difference between either of your versions. So don't understand the argument here. But I do understand that an Admin will be deciding who is blocked, and for what. So far I don't see anything done by either of you to warrant a block. Now you two go and place nice! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 23:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, October 10, 2007
Line 40:		Line 40:
	==Liberal evolution==		==Liberal evolution==
	Evolution is a scientific theory, it is neither liberal nor conservative, please don't politicize science. You can put the creationist view in as well but please don't present it as fact. --[[User:Canadarules\|Canadarules]] 21:38, 9 October 2007 (EDT)		Evolution is a scientific theory, it is neither liberal nor conservative, please don't politicize science. You can put the creationist view in as well but please don't present it as fact. --[[User:Canadarules\|Canadarules]] 21:38, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	*In [[Saber Toothed Tiger]] I don't see any difference between either of your versions. So don't understand the argument here. But I do understand that an Admin will be deciding who is blocked, and for what. So far I don't see anything done by either of you to warrant a block. Now you two go and place nice! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK\|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK\|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 23:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, October 10, 2007
Line 38:		Line 38:

	: Thank you very much. I hope that I will use them wisely. [[User:SkipJohnson\|SkipJohnson]] 10:30, 9 October 2007 (EDT)		: Thank you very much. I hope that I will use them wisely. [[User:SkipJohnson\|SkipJohnson]] 10:30, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
		+	==Liberal evolution==
		+	Evolution is a scientific theory, it is neither liberal nor conservative, please don't politicize science. You can put the creationist view in as well but please don't present it as fact. --[[User:Canadarules\|Canadarules]] 21:38, 9 October 2007 (EDT)