Difference between revisions of "Natural Numbers"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(first draft. needs something about transcendentals? quaternions and bestiality?)
 
(corrected entry)
Line 1: Line 1:
The positive integers, 0, 1, 2, 57, etc.
+
Natural numbers are the positive integers, 1, 2, 3, 17, 100, etcIn set theory, zero is also included.
 
+
== Origins ==
+
 
+
All numbers used in the [[Bible]] are [[positive]] [[integers]], for example, 20 loaves of bread, 4 horsemen of the apocalypse, 50 ways to leave your loverBy inference, all such numbers are referred to as "natural".  Other other numbers are equated with progressive degrees of unnaturalness.  The [[negative]] numbers are commonly associated with basic [[evil]].  The [[CIA]] uses negative numbers to denominate the ranks of terrorist groups, -1 is an ordinary member, -2 is a squadron leader, etc.  This is because there is no [[lower bound]] to the negative numbers and thus no limit need be imposed on their evil[https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/gz.html].  The [[rational]] numbers are the next most unnatural numbers.  Rationality runs directly counter to naturalness, see [[evolution]] vs [[creationism]], [[Einstein]] vs [[Newton]].  [[Irrational]] numbers are the first numbers that cannot be formed from [[arithmetic]] operations of natural numbers and thus are the first [[unbiblical]] numbers[http://americansfortruth.com/news/report-highlights-unbiblical-beliefs-of-obama-and-his-pastor.html].  [[Complex numbers]] are the most unnatural numbers.  Recent research has suggested a link between [[homosexuality]] and complex-valued genetic base-pairs[http://www.narth.com/docs/lefthand.html].
+

Revision as of 15:46, February 22, 2007

Natural numbers are the positive integers, 1, 2, 3, 17, 100, etc. In set theory, zero is also included.