Difference between revisions of "Mindless equality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Mindless equality''' is the insistence that everybody be treated equally in disregard of valid reasons for different treatment.  Examples include:
 
'''Mindless equality''' is the insistence that everybody be treated equally in disregard of valid reasons for different treatment.  Examples include:
  
*treating as equal old Caucasian ladies and young men of Islamic origin in screening at airports
+
*Treating as equal old Caucasian ladies and young men of Islamic origin in screening at airports
*treating as equal women and men in filling combat positions in the military
+
*Treating as equal women and men in filling combat positions in the military
*treating as equal all types of music, from [[Beethoven]] to vulgar rap performers
+
*Treating as equal all types of music, from [[Beethoven]] to vulgar rap performers
*treating as equal literature and science from all cultures, no matter how primitive
+
*Treating as equal literature and science from all cultures, no matter how primitive
*in Atlanta a female magazine editor has complained that 'Men at Work' signs are biased.<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,379842,00.html</ref>
+
 
 +
In Atlanta a female magazine editor has complained that 'Men at Work' signs are prejudiced in favor of males.<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,379842,00.html</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 17:59, April 27, 2010

Mindless equality is the insistence that everybody be treated equally in disregard of valid reasons for different treatment. Examples include:

  • Treating as equal old Caucasian ladies and young men of Islamic origin in screening at airports
  • Treating as equal women and men in filling combat positions in the military
  • Treating as equal all types of music, from Beethoven to vulgar rap performers
  • Treating as equal literature and science from all cultures, no matter how primitive

In Atlanta a female magazine editor has complained that 'Men at Work' signs are prejudiced in favor of males.[1]

References

  1. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,379842,00.html