Difference between revisions of "Talk:Censorability"
From Conservapedia
(Allocating scores?) |
(Classroom prayer would have high censorability, I think) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I must say this is powerful stuff providing amazing insights. I have noticed that both [[classroom prayer]] and economic [[allocative efficiency]] are objected to by [[Liberal]]s, and as such they will try and censor them. What I would like to do is quantify the censorability of [[classroom prayer]] and economic [[allocative efficiency]]. I am, however, uncertain as to how I should ascertain the censorability score on the scale of "0" to "1" for the afore mentioned. [[User:AmandaBunting|AmandaBunting]] 09:55, 28 May 2010 (EDT) | ::I must say this is powerful stuff providing amazing insights. I have noticed that both [[classroom prayer]] and economic [[allocative efficiency]] are objected to by [[Liberal]]s, and as such they will try and censor them. What I would like to do is quantify the censorability of [[classroom prayer]] and economic [[allocative efficiency]]. I am, however, uncertain as to how I should ascertain the censorability score on the scale of "0" to "1" for the afore mentioned. [[User:AmandaBunting|AmandaBunting]] 09:55, 28 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: The scoring system could be improved. Classroom prayer would have high censorability, I think. Please improve this as you think best.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:02, 28 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:02, May 28, 2010
andy, could we have some sources??? --Johnb 19:04, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- John, censorability is as logical a concept as the idea that 2+2=4. I suppose you also require "sources" for such logical truths as the positive effects of school prayer and of reading the Bible. Open your mind. EdwardS 19:14, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- Right. What's next, demanding a source for an arithmetic calculation?--Andy Schlafly 21:02, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- so, you're refusing to simply cite a source, which I "requested". My mind is open, i just wanted this page to adhere to the Conservapedia Commandments. also, some cites with maths would be nice, because it would give the population links to further information. --Johnb 21:22, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- "Everything you post must be true and verifiable," requires the Conservapedia Commandments. Original insights can qualify. Unlike Wikipedia, Conservapedia welcomes original, logical entries. Conservapedia advances knowledge rather than merely regurgitating and distorting it as liberal sources do.--Andy Schlafly 21:34, 27 May 2010 (EDT)
- I must say this is powerful stuff providing amazing insights. I have noticed that both classroom prayer and economic allocative efficiency are objected to by Liberals, and as such they will try and censor them. What I would like to do is quantify the censorability of classroom prayer and economic allocative efficiency. I am, however, uncertain as to how I should ascertain the censorability score on the scale of "0" to "1" for the afore mentioned. AmandaBunting 09:55, 28 May 2010 (EDT)
- The scoring system could be improved. Classroom prayer would have high censorability, I think. Please improve this as you think best.--Andy Schlafly 10:02, 28 May 2010 (EDT)
