Difference between revisions of "Talk:South Park"
(→keep) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Why make this?== | ==Why make this?== | ||
| − | If it is so bad, then why talk about it? I mean i used to watch some of the movies with my cousins, but that was just to get a laugh. Is this worth updateing? | + | If it is so bad, then why talk about it? I mean i used to watch some of the movies with my cousins, but that was just to get a laugh. Is this worth updateing? Will N. |
Revision as of 14:40, June 19, 2007
Why make this?
If it is so bad, then why talk about it? I mean i used to watch some of the movies with my cousins, but that was just to get a laugh. Is this worth updateing? Will N.
That is not a very good argument for deletion. We have an article on the holocaust, and last time I checked that was bad. Don't get me wrong; we should definitely delete this article. It's just that our only reason cannot be that it is bad. David R
I do not understand the concern. The article discussed the program accuaratly
keep
This is a very respectfully stated and tasteful article about an extremely distasteful subject. If we leave out articles about the enemies of morality and religion, what use are we? That would be like leaving out an article on Satan because he is the Prince of Evil.
Article needs lots of expansion. It seems to focus on one reviewer's opinion of the South Park movie, to the detriment of the television series, or spin-off phenomena like "South Park Republicans." There's very little about SP's spat with Scientology, or the Muhammad censorship -- both of which were very public and attracted attention at conservative sites like FreeRepublic.com. And at one point there is a bolded exclamation that seems to address the author, which is just strange and kind of post-modern.--All Fish Welcome 21:10, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
