Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unificationism"
From Conservapedia
(sysop comment) |
RobbieFowler (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's fairly obvious that a coordinated attack is not the same as "providing legitimate information". If the two gentlemen I block have reason to give credence to the sources supplied, I wonder why they felt it more important to repeat their changes than to explain them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:31, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | It's fairly obvious that a coordinated attack is not the same as "providing legitimate information". If the two gentlemen I block have reason to give credence to the sources supplied, I wonder why they felt it more important to repeat their changes than to explain them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:31, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It's fairly obvious that adding information to an encyclopedia article is not the same as a "coordinated attack". Explain the changes? Bit difficult for them to do that as you blocked them both immediately. That instablocking on your part, without asking for explanations of edits, was more of a "coordinated attack", hmm? [[User:RobbieFowler|RobbieFowler]] 11:45, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:45, April 30, 2008
It's fairly obvious that a coordinated attack is not the same as "providing legitimate information". If the two gentlemen I block have reason to give credence to the sources supplied, I wonder why they felt it more important to repeat their changes than to explain them. --Ed Poor Talk 11:31, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
- It's fairly obvious that adding information to an encyclopedia article is not the same as a "coordinated attack". Explain the changes? Bit difficult for them to do that as you blocked them both immediately. That instablocking on your part, without asking for explanations of edits, was more of a "coordinated attack", hmm? RobbieFowler 11:45, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
