Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tibetan independence"
From Conservapedia
PaulDiFoglio (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think I can speak for most by saying it is a human right to freely practice a religion. By denying this basic right, the people must take a stand and determine what is the best way forward. We support the right of independence anywhere on the globe, including Tibet.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:50, 4 June 2012 (EDT) | :I think I can speak for most by saying it is a human right to freely practice a religion. By denying this basic right, the people must take a stand and determine what is the best way forward. We support the right of independence anywhere on the globe, including Tibet.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:50, 4 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Great! Thank you! [[User:PaulDiFoglio|PaulDiFoglio]] 01:11, 8 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:11, June 8, 2012
I was just curious as to what Conservapedia's opinion on Tibetan independence is. Is there a consensus more or less from conservative Christians on the issue? PaulDiFoglio 22:35, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
- I think I can speak for most by saying it is a human right to freely practice a religion. By denying this basic right, the people must take a stand and determine what is the best way forward. We support the right of independence anywhere on the globe, including Tibet.--Jpatt 23:50, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
- Great! Thank you! PaulDiFoglio 01:11, 8 June 2012 (EDT)
