Difference between revisions of "ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Removing all content from page)
Line 1: Line 1:
In '''''ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish''''', 490 U.S. 605 (1989), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] restated the [[Rooker-Feldman doctrine]] that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in the lower federal courts of a decision reached by the highest state court, because such authority is vested solely in the [[U.S. Supreme Court]]. See:
+
 
*''District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman'', 460 U.S. 462 (1983)
+
*''Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers'', 398 U.S. 281, 296 (1970)
+
*''Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.'', 263 U.S. 413, 415-416 (1923)
+
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+

Revision as of 20:06, 11 November 2007