Apprendi v. New Jersey

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Apprendi v. New Jersey as edited by DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) at 01:54, 13 July 2016. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.

Justice John Paul Stevens delivered the opinion of the court, joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Justices Thomas (joined in part by Justice Scalia) and Scalia filed concurring opinions. Justices Sandra Day O'Connor (joined by Justices William Rehnquist, Anthony Kennedy, and Stephen Breyer) and Breyer (joined by Justice Rehnquist) filed dissenting opinions.

External links

  • Opinions at FindLaw (registration may be required)