Last modified on 7 August 2007, at 13:03

Apprendi v. New Jersey

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ed Poor (Talk | contribs) at 13:03, 7 August 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.