Difference between revisions of "Argument from consciousness"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→Objections) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→Objections) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
===Objections=== | ===Objections=== | ||
− | * This argument fails to address [[gestalt | + | * This argument fails to address [[gestalt]] consciousness. |
* [[Evolutionists]] typically argue that consciousness may happen by chance. However, this is highly illogical and unlikely, so is yet another weak argument for atheism (see: [[Atheism and irrationality]]). | * [[Evolutionists]] typically argue that consciousness may happen by chance. However, this is highly illogical and unlikely, so is yet another weak argument for atheism (see: [[Atheism and irrationality]]). | ||
* Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics. | * Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics. |
Revision as of 21:49, August 13, 2019
The argument from consciousness is an argument for the existence of God based on the problems consciousness poses for the atheistic worldview. The best-known defender of the argument from consciousness is J.P. Moreland.[1] See: Atheism and consciousness
- Nature consists of a finite number of elements.
- We (our physical bodies) consist of those elements.
- The elements themselves which we consist of, and nature itself, have no consciousness.
- Despite our elements themselves having no consciousness, we do.
- Consciousness can not happen by chance, therefore there must be a being who supply that to us.
- Infinite regress of beings is illogical, therefore a single, uncaused causer must be the causer of consciousness.
- This uncaused causer of the conscience is God
Professor John Piippo on the argument from consciousness:
- The Argument from Consciousness for the Existence of God by John Piippo
- Consciousness: One of Atheism's Irresolvable Problems by John Piippo
Contents
Objections
- This argument fails to address gestalt consciousness.
- Evolutionists typically argue that consciousness may happen by chance. However, this is highly illogical and unlikely, so is yet another weak argument for atheism (see: Atheism and irrationality).
- Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics.
- The last point (that the uncaused causer is God) is unsupported unless it is taken as a statement of definition. If this is the case, the prior arguments are unnecessary.
External links
- Argument from Consciousness - 8 videos
See also
- Atheism and the brain
- Atheism and reason
- Atheism and critical thinking
- Atheism and knowledge
- Atheism and irrationality
- Atheism and logic
- Atheism and transhumanism
- Atheism and intelligence