Difference between revisions of "Blitzkrieg"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(propaganda term, not military; dl innuendo)
Line 1: Line 1:
A blitzkrieg is a quick surprise attack by massive ground and air forces.  "Blitzkrieg" is from the German words for lighting ("blitz") and war ("krieg"). High ranking German officers came up with the term to describe their [[World War II]] strategy, which was used in all the [[Nazi]] invasions. The strategy is still used today in quick wars, like the invasion of Iraq in 2004. The war was one between two militaries, but America's superior power, coupled with shock-tactics and speed destroyed the Iraqi military very quickly, much like the German annihilation of Polish armed forces in September 1939.
+
A blitzkrieg is a quick surprise attack by massive ground and air forces.  "Blitzkrieg" is from the German words for lighting ("blitz") and war ("krieg"). The term was not used by German military planners, and had it's origins the Propaganda Ministry of Josef Goebbels. It was used in press accounts to describe the lightening speed of the German military during  [[World War II]].
  
 
==German use during World War II==
 
==German use during World War II==

Revision as of 11:28, 25 March 2007

A blitzkrieg is a quick surprise attack by massive ground and air forces. "Blitzkrieg" is from the German words for lighting ("blitz") and war ("krieg"). The term was not used by German military planners, and had it's origins the Propaganda Ministry of Josef Goebbels. It was used in press accounts to describe the lightening speed of the German military during World War II.

German use during World War II

Blitzkrieg was a maneuver tactic where armored columns would break through the enemy lines, supported by artillery and attack aircraft. Once the columns were through the line, they would not stop but continue into the enemy rear, disrupting their supply lines and cutting off units. The armored columns were followed by infantry units that would exploit the gaps and surround the isolated enemy units. The tactic worked most effectively in Europe against the French and the Netherlands, and in the beginning of the conflict against the Soviet Union. It's success was due to a combination of surprise and favorable terrain.

There was three flaws to the Blitzkrieg tactic. First, it was heavily dependent on good weather and good terrain. If the terrain was hilly, combat was in an urban area, or if the weather turned the ground muddy (as in the Soviet Union), the armored units would slow down and become vulnerable to anti-tank units.

Second, air support was vital. Without it, the tanks were vulnerable to counter-attacks from enemy aircraft. As the war progressed and the Germans lost control of the air, their panzer units suffered heavy losses from Allied air-to-ground aircraft such as the Soviet IL-2 and American P-47 Thunderbolt.

Third, the blitzkrieg could be broken up by channeling the attack (holding the flanks) and attacking the point where the infantry and armored units met. This would separate the two and expose the armor to counter-attacks. The French and British used this tactic at the Battle of Arras in 1940, but lacked the armored units required to exploit their limited success.

The Soviets used all the above and had the additional fortune of vast swaths of land to design a defense-in-depth. As the panzer units moved further and further from their supplies, gaps would appear in their columns. These could then be attacked to break up the armor. Also, the Soviets used minefields to further disrupt the German armor.

By 1944, blitzkrieg as a German tactic was finished. The last actual appearance of blitzkrieg in the war was when General George S. Patton's Third Army broke out of the Normandy Pocket in Operation Cobra. The Allied columns covered 600 miles in just under two weeks.


References

Frieser, K.H. 'The Blitzkrieg Legend: The 1940 Campaign in the West'