Difference between revisions of "Christine Blasey Ford"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''[[The Washington Post]]'', noted for [[fake news]] and an [[anti-Trump]] bias, first published Blasey Ford's allegations under an anonymous op-ed byline. Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]], who was recently exposed as [[colluding]] with [[Chinese]] intelligence for twenty years, passed the anonymous allegations along to ''WaPo'' and indicated she herself did not believe the allegations.<ref>https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/18/democrats-hearing-ford-kavanaugh-feinstein-truthful/</ref> | ''[[The Washington Post]]'', noted for [[fake news]] and an [[anti-Trump]] bias, first published Blasey Ford's allegations under an anonymous op-ed byline. Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]], who was recently exposed as [[colluding]] with [[Chinese]] intelligence for twenty years, passed the anonymous allegations along to ''WaPo'' and indicated she herself did not believe the allegations.<ref>https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/18/democrats-hearing-ford-kavanaugh-feinstein-truthful/</ref> | ||
| − | Blasey Ford was granted an extraordinary amount of [[white privilege]] by [[racist]] [[liberal]] Democrats and [[mainstream media]] while the accuser of Democrat party Vice Chairman [[Keith Ellison]], who alleged woman-beating and abuse, | + | Blasey Ford was granted an extraordinary amount of [[white privilege]] by [[racist]] [[liberal]] Democrats and [[mainstream media]] while the accuser of Democrat party Vice Chairman [[Keith Ellison]], who id alleged to have been engaged in woman-beating and abuse, has been isolated and ignored. Both Ellison and the accuser are minorities. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 17:46, September 23, 2018
Christine Blasey Ford is a George Soros mercenary who made confusing and conflicting allegations about SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh to deflect allegations by the MeToo movement against major Hollywood and media donors to the Democrat Party prior to the 2018 Midterm election.[1] Blasey Ford refused to back up her claims under oath when invited by the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary Committee to do so.[2] She later relented and agreed to give sworn testimony, implying senior Republican leaders were not "fair" in asking her to do so.[3]
The Washington Post, noted for fake news and an anti-Trump bias, first published Blasey Ford's allegations under an anonymous op-ed byline. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who was recently exposed as colluding with Chinese intelligence for twenty years, passed the anonymous allegations along to WaPo and indicated she herself did not believe the allegations.[4]
Blasey Ford was granted an extraordinary amount of white privilege by racist liberal Democrats and mainstream media while the accuser of Democrat party Vice Chairman Keith Ellison, who id alleged to have been engaged in woman-beating and abuse, has been isolated and ignored. Both Ellison and the accuser are minorities.
See also
References
- ↑ https://washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/18/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-and-links-ge/
- ↑ https://time.com/5398806/senate-public-hearing-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford/
- ↑ https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/20/kavanaugh-accuser-testimony-senate/
- ↑ https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/18/democrats-hearing-ford-kavanaugh-feinstein-truthful/
