Difference between revisions of "City of Houston, Tex. v. Hill"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
In '''''City of Houston, Tex. v. Hill''''', 482 U.S. 451 (1987), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that unconstitutionally vague a city ordinance prohibiting speech that "in any manner" interrupts a police officer in the performance of his duties, without limitation to fighting words or to obscene or opprobrious language was unconstitutionally vague.
+
In '''''City of Houston, Tex. v. Hill''''', 482 U.S. 451 (1987), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a city ordinance prohibiting speech that "in any manner" interrupts a police officer in the performance of his duties, without limitation to fighting words or to obscene or opprobrious language was unconstitutionally vague.
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Revision as of 19:18, 1 August 2009

In City of Houston, Tex. v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a city ordinance prohibiting speech that "in any manner" interrupts a police officer in the performance of his duties, without limitation to fighting words or to obscene or opprobrious language was unconstitutionally vague.