Difference between revisions of "Complex number"

Latest revision as of 01:02, August 14, 2018

\text{[math]}

$\text{[math]}$

This article/section deals with mathematical concepts appropriate for a student in mid to late high school.

The complex numbers are a set of numbers which have important applications in the analysis of periodic, oscillatory, or wavelike phenomena. Mathematicians denote the set of complex numbers with an ornate capital letter: $\text{[math]}$ . They are the 5th item in this hierarchy of types of numbers:

The "natural numbers", 1, 2, 3, ... (There is controversy about whether zero should be included. It doesn't matter.)
The "integers"—positive, negative, and zero
The "rational numbers", or fractions, like 355/113
The "real numbers", including irrational numbers
The "complex numbers", which give solutions to polynomial equations

A complex number is composed of two parts, or components—a real component and an imaginary component. Each of these components is an ordinary (that is, real) number. The complex numbers form an "extension" of the real numbers: If the imaginary component of a complex number is zero, that number is essentially identical to the real number that is its real component.

The second component is called the imaginary part. Its unit basis vector is called $\text{[math]}$ . The first component is called the real part. Its unit basis vector is just 1. Thus, the complex number $\text{[math]}$ can also be written $\text{[math]}$ . Numbers with real part of zero are sometimes called "pure imaginary", with the term "complex" reserved for numbers with both components nonzero.

While the "invisible" nature of the imaginary component may be disconcerting at first (and the word "imaginary" may be an unfortunate term for it), the complex numbers are just as genuine as the Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences that are used in the definition of the "real" numbers.

The complex numbers form a field, with the mathematical operations defined as shown below.

Arithmetic operations

The field operations are defined as follows:

Addition

Addition is just the standard addition on the 2-dimensional vector space. That is, add the real parts (first components), and add the imaginary parts (second components).

Letting the complex numbers w and z be defined by their respective components:

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

we have:

\text{[math]}

Multiplication

Multiplication has a special definition. It is this definition that gives the complex numbers their important properties.

\text{[math]}

When we multiply

\text{[math]}

, this definition gives

\text{[math]}

Writing out the product $\text{[math]}$ in the obvious way, we get the same answer:

\text{[math]}

This means that, using $\text{[math]}$ , one can perform arithmetic operations in a completely natural way.

Division

Division requires a special trick. We have:

\text{[math]}

To get the individual components, the denominator needs to be real. This can be accomplished by multiplying both numerator and denominator by $\text{[math]}$ . We get:

\text{[math]}

This division will fail if and only if $\text{[math]}$ , that is, $\text{[math]}$ and $\text{[math]}$ are both zero, that is, the complex denominator $\text{[math]}$ is exactly zero (both components zero). This is exactly analogous to the rule that real division fails if the denominator is exactly zero.

Fundamental theorem of algebra

The complex numbers form an algebraically closed field. This means that any $\text{[math]}$ degree polynomial can be factored into n first degree (linear) polynomials. Equivalently, such a polynomial has n roots (though one has to count all multiple occurrences of repeated roots.) This statement is the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, first proved by Carl Friedrich Gauss around 1800. The theorem is not true if the roots are required to be real. (This failure is what led to the development of complex numbers in the first place.) But when the roots are allowed to be complex, the theorem applies even to polynomials with complex coefficents.

The simplest polynomial with no real roots is $\text{[math]}$ , since -1 has no real square root. But if we look for roots of the form $\text{[math]}$ , we have:

\text{[math]}

For the imaginary part to be zero, one of a or b must be zero. For the real part to be zero, a must be zero and $\text{[math]}$ must be 1. This means that $\text{[math]}$ , so the roots are $\text{[math]}$ and $\text{[math]}$ , or $\text{[math]}$ .

These two numbers, $\text{[math]}$ and $\text{[math]}$ , are the square roots of -1.

Similar analysis shows that, for example, 1 has three cube roots:

$\text{[math]}$
$\text{[math]}$
$\text{[math]}$

One can verify that $\text{[math]}$

For a given field, the field containing it (strictly speaking, the smallest such field) that is algebraically closed is called its algebraic closure. The field of real numbers is not algebraically closed; its closure is the field of complex numbers.

Polar coordinates, modulus, and phase

Complex numbers are often depicted in 2-dimensional Cartesian analytic geometry; this is called the complex plane. The real part is the x-coordinate, and the imaginary part is the y-coordinate. When these points are analyzed in polar coordinates, some very interesting properties become apparent. The representation of complex numbers in this way is called an Argand diagram.

If a complex number is represented as $\text{[math]}$ , its polar coordinates are given by:

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

Transforming the other way, we have:

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

The radial distance from the origin, $\text{[math]}$ , is called the modulus. It is the complex equivalent of the absolute value for real numbers. It is zero if and only if the complex number is zero.

The angle, $\text{[math]}$ , is called the phase. (Some older books refer to it as the argument.) It is zero for positive real numbers, and $\text{[math]}$ radians (180 degrees) for negative ones.

The multiplication of complex numbers takes a particularly interesting and useful form when represented this way. If two complex numbers $\text{[math]}$ and $\text{[math]}$ are represented in modulus/phase form, we have:

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

But that is just the addition rule for sines and cosines!

\text{[math]}

So the rule for multiplying complex numbers on the Argand diagram is just:

Multiply the moduli.

Add the phases.

One can use this property to find all of the n^th roots of a number geometrically. For example, by using these trigonometric formulas:

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

The three cube roots of 1, listed above, can all be seen to have moduli of 1 and phases of 0 degrees, 120 degrees, and 240 degrees respectively. When raised to the third power, the phases are tripled, obtaining 0, 360, and 720 degrees. But they are all the same angle—zero. So the cubes of these numbers are all just one. Similarly, $\text{[math]}$ and $\text{[math]}$ have phases of 90 degrees and 270 degrees. When those numbers are squared, the phases are 180 and 540, both of which are the same angle—180 degrees. So their squares are both -1.

One can apply this property to the n^th roots of any complex number. They lie equally spaced on a circle. This is DeMoivre's theorem.

The three cube roots of +1.

The two square roots of -1.

Euler's formula

A careful analysis of the power series for the exponential, sine, and cosine functions reveals the marvelous Euler formula:

\text{[math]}

of which there is the famous case (for θ = π):

\text{[math]}

Conjugates

The complex conjugate, or just conjugate, of a complex number is the result of negating its imaginary part. The conjugate is written with a bar over the quantity: $\text{[math]}$ . All real numbers are their own conjugates.

All arithmetic operations work naturally with conjugates—the sum of the conjugates is the conjugate of the sum, and so on.

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

It follows that, if P is a polynomial with real coefficients (so that its coefficients are their own conjugates)

\text{[math]}

If $\text{[math]}$ is a root of a real polynomial, then, since zero is its own conjugate, $\text{[math]}$ is also a root. This is often expressed as "Non-real roots of real polynomials come in conjugate pairs." We saw that above for the cube roots of 1—two of the roots are complex and are conjugates of each other. The third root is its own conjugate.

Transcendental functions

The higher mathematical functions (often called "transcendental functions"), like exponential, log, sine, cosine, etc., can be defined in terms of power series (Taylor series). They can be extended to handle complex arguments in the completely natural way, so these functions are defined over the complex plane. They are in fact "complex analytic functions". Just about any normal function one can think of can be extended to the complex numbers, and is complex analytic. Since the power series coefficients of the common functions are real, they work naturally with conjugates. For example:

\text{[math]}

\text{[math]}

Complex functions

The general study of functions that take a complex argument and return a complex result is an extremely rich and useful area of mathematics, known as complex analysis. When such a function is differentiable, it is called a complex analytic function, or just analytic function.

Applications

Complex numbers are extremely important in many areas of pure and applied mathematics and physics. Basically, any description of oscillatory phenomena can benefit from a formulation in terms of complex numbers.

The applications include these:

Theoretical mathematics:

algebra— (including finding roots of polynomials)

linear algebra—vector spaces, inner products, Hermitian and unitary operators, Hilbert spaces, etc.

eigenvalue/eigenvector problems

number theory—This seems improbable, but it is true. The Riemann zeta function, and the Riemann hypothesis, are very important in number theory. For a long time, the only proofs of the prime number theorem used complex numbers. The Wiles/Taylor proof of Fermat's Last Theorem uses modular forms, which use complex numbers.

trigonometry—finding arcsine and arccosine functions of numbers with absolute values more than 1 or arcsecant and arccosecant functions with absolute values between 0 and 1.

Applied mathematics

eigenvalue/eigenvector problems

Fourier and Laplace transforms

linear differential equations

stability theory

Electrical engineering

alternating current circuit analysis

filter design

antenna design

Theoretical physics

quantum mechanics

fundamental particle physics

electromagnetic radiation

optics

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-A '''complex number''' is a [[number]] composed of two parts - a [[Real number|real]] component and and [[Imaginary number|imaginary]] component, of the form <math>a + bi</math>, where ''a'' and ''b'' are real numbers and <math>i^2 = -1</math>.
+{{Math-m}}
-Whereas the real numbers can be represented as all the possible points on an infinitely extended [[number line]], to represent all the complex numbers requires the use of a two dimensional coordinate system, usually with the real components on the horizontal axis (the ''abscissa'') and the imaginary components on the vertical axis (the ''ordinate'').
+The '''complex numbers''' are a set of numbers which have important applications in the analysis of periodic, oscillatory, or wavelike phenomena.  Mathematicians denote the set of complex numbers with an ornate capital letter: <math>\mathbb{C}</math>.  They are the 5th item in this hierarchy of types of [[number]]s:
-The complex numbers form an [[algebraic closure|algebraically closed]] [[field (mathematics)|field]] but do not permit a non-trivial ordering that is preserved under operations.  They are the algebraic closure of the [[real numbers|real numbers]].
+*The "[[natural number]]s", 1, 2, 3, ...  (There is controversy about whether zero should be included.  It doesn't matter.)
+*The "[[integer]]s"&mdash;positive, negative, and [[zero]]
+*The "[[rational number]]s", or [[fraction]]s, like 355/113
+*The "[[real number]]s", including irrational numbers
+*The "complex numbers", which give solutions to polynomial equations
-===In popular culture===
+A complex number is composed of two parts, or components&mdash;a ''real'' component and an ''imaginary'' component.  Each of these components is an ordinary (that is, real) number.  The complex numbers form an "extension" of the real numbers:  If the imaginary component of a complex number is zero, that number is essentially identical to the real number that is its real component.
-In [[Yvgeny Zamyatin]]'s satirical novel ''[[We (novel)|We]]'', the narrator's psychological distress at contemplating the concept of complex numbers becomes a metaphor for the limitations of totalitarian systems of thought.
+__TOC__
+<!-- This paragraph taken out.  The closure stuff is treated below.  The ordering stuff, while true, doesn't seem relevant to what we are saying.  The matrix material seems unmotivated and unclear.  (In any case, that's not the "necessity of complex numbers" -- the necessity arose from finding roots of polynomials.)  If someone can put the material about equations of motion / eigenvectors / evolution / amplitudes into a focused and clear explanation, please do so, but it probably wouldn't belong on this page.
+The complex numbers form an [[algebraic closure|algebraically closed]] [[field (mathematics)|field]] but do not permit a non-trivial ordering that is preserved under operations.  They are the algebraic closure of the [[real numbers]]. One notable consequence, and a very natural way of seeing the necessity of complex numbers is the fact that all matrices of full rank over a vector space over real numbers repesent transformations, which, after a base transformation, are equivalent to a diagonal matrix of the same size with complex entries on the diagonal. Thus, any linear linear equation of motion of arbitrary order and dimension of real numbers can be represented in this way and be decomposed into eigenvectors (or modes). The evolution of the system is fully described by the complex amplitudes.
+-->
+The complex numbers are defined as a 2-dimensional vector space over the [[real number]]s.  That is, a complex number is an ordered pair of numbers: (a, b).  The familiar real numbers constitute the complex numbers with second component zero.  That is, x corresponds to (x, 0).
+The second component is called the ''imaginary part''.  Its unit basis vector is called <math>i</math>.  The first component is called the ''real part''.  Its unit basis vector is just 1.  Thus, the complex number <math>(a, b)\,</math> can also be written <math>a + bi\,</math>.  Numbers with real part of zero are sometimes called "pure imaginary", with the term "complex" reserved for numbers with both components nonzero.
+While the "invisible" nature of the imaginary component may be disconcerting at first (and the word "imaginary" may be an unfortunate term for it), the complex numbers are just as genuine as the Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences that are used in the definition of the "real" numbers.
+The complex numbers form a [[Field (mathematics)|field]], with the mathematical operations defined as shown below.
+==Arithmetic operations==
+The field operations are defined as follows:
+===Addition===
+Addition is just the standard addition on the 2-dimensional vector space.  That is, add the real parts (first components), and add the imaginary parts (second components).
+Letting the complex numbers w and z be defined by their respective components:
+:<math>w = (a, b) = a + bi\,</math>
+:<math>z = (c, d) = c + di\,</math>
+we have:
+:<math>w + z = (a+c, b+d) = a+c + (b+d)i\,</math>
+===Multiplication===
+Multiplication has a special definition.  It is this definition that gives the complex numbers their important properties.
+:<math>w * z = (a*c - b*d) + (a*d + b*c)i\,</math>
+:::When we multiply <math>(0+1i)*(0+1i)\,</math>, this definition gives <math>i^2 = -1\,</math>
+Writing out the product <math>w * z\,</math> in the obvious way, we get the same answer:
+:<math>(a + bi) * (c + di) = a*c + b*d*i^2 + (a*d + b*c)i = (a*c - b*d) + (a*d + b*c)i\,</math>
+This means that, using <math>i^2 = -1\,</math>, one can perform arithmetic operations in a completely natural way.
+===Division===
+Division requires a special trick.  We have:
+:<math>\frac{w}{z} = \frac{a + bi}{c + di}\,</math>
+To get the individual components, the denominator needs to be real.  This can be accomplished by multiplying both numerator and denominator by <math>(c - di)\,</math>.  We get:
+:<math>\frac{w}{z} = \frac{(a + bi)*(c - di)}{(c + di)*(c - di)} = \frac{(a*c + b*d) + (b*c - a*d)i}{c^2 + d^2}\,</math>
+This division will fail if and only if <math>c^2 + d^2 = 0\,</math>, that is, <math>c\,</math> and <math>d\,</math> are both zero, that is, the complex denominator <math>z\,</math> is exactly zero (both components zero).  This is exactly analogous to the rule that real division fails if the denominator is exactly zero.
+==Fundamental theorem of algebra==
+The complex numbers form an [[algebraic closure|algebraically closed]] field.  This means that any <math>n^{th}\,</math> degree polynomial can be factored into n first degree (linear) polynomials.  Equivalently, such a polynomial has n roots (though one has to count all multiple occurrences of repeated roots.)  This statement is the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, first proved by [[Gauss|Carl Friedrich Gauss]] around 1800.  The theorem is ''not true'' if the roots are required to be real.  (This failure is what led to the development of complex numbers in the first place.)  But when the roots are allowed to be complex, the theorem applies even to polynomials with complex coefficents.
+The simplest polynomial with no real roots is <math>x^2 + 1\,</math>, since -1 has no real square root.  But if we look for roots of the form <math>a + bi\,</math>, we have:
+:<math>(a + bi)^2 + 1 = a^2 - b^2 + 1 + 2abi = 0\,</math>
+For the imaginary part to be zero, one of a or b must be zero.  For the real part to be zero, a must be zero and <math>b^2\,</math> must be 1.  This means that <math>b = \pm 1\,</math>, so the roots are <math>(0, 1)\,</math> and <math>(0, -1)\,</math>, or <math>\pm{}i\,</math>.
+These two numbers, <math>i\,</math> and <math>-i\,</math>, are the square roots of -1.
+Similar analysis shows that, for example, 1 has three cube roots:
+*<math>1\,</math>
+*<math>-\frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}i\,</math>
+*<math>-\frac{1}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}i\,</math>
+One can verify that
+<math>(x-1) \left(x + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}i\right) \left(x + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}i\right) = x^3 - 1\,</math>
+For a given field, the field containing it (strictly speaking, the smallest such field) that is algebraically closed is called its algebraic closure.  The field of real numbers is not algebraically closed; its closure is the field of complex numbers.
+==Polar coordinates, modulus, and phase==
+Complex numbers are often depicted in 2-dimensional Cartesian analytic geometry; this is called the ''complex plane''.  The real part is the x-coordinate, and the imaginary part is the y-coordinate.  When these points are analyzed in [[polar coordinates]], some very interesting properties become apparent.  The representation of complex numbers in this way is called an ''Argand diagram''.
+If a complex number is represented as <math>x + yi\,</math>, its polar coordinates are given by:
+:<math>r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}\,</math>
+:<math>\theta = \tan^{-1}\frac{y}{x}\,</math>
+Transforming the other way, we have:
+:<math>x = r \cos\theta\,</math>
+:<math>y = r \sin\theta\,</math>
+The radial distance from the origin, <math>r\,</math>, is called the ''modulus''.  It is the complex equivalent of the absolute value for real numbers.  It is zero if and only if the complex number is zero.
+The angle, <math>\theta\,</math>, is called the ''phase''.  (Some older books refer to it as the ''argument''.)  It is zero for positive real numbers, and <math>\pi\,</math> radians (180 degrees) for negative ones.
+The multiplication of complex numbers takes a particularly interesting and useful form when represented this way.  If two complex numbers <math>z_1\,</math> and <math>z_2\,</math> are represented in modulus/phase form, we have:
+:<math>z_1 = r_1 (\cos\theta_1 + i\sin\theta_1)\,</math>
+:<math>z_2 = r_2 (\cos\theta_2 + i\sin\theta_2)\,</math>
+:<math>z_1 * z_2 = r_1 * r_2 * ((\cos\theta_1 \cos\theta_2 - \sin\theta_1 \sin\theta_2) + i (\sin\theta_1 \cos\theta_2 + \cos\theta_1 \sin\theta_2))\,</math>
+But that is just the addition rule for sines and cosines!
+:<math>z_1 * z_2 = r_1 * r_2 * (\cos(\theta_1 + \theta_2) + i \sin(\theta_1 + \theta_2))\,</math>
+So the rule for multiplying complex numbers on the Argand diagram is just:
+:Multiply the moduli.
+:Add the phases.
+One can use this property to find all of the n<sup>th</sup> roots of a number geometrically.  For example, by using these trigonometric formulas:
+::<math>\sin(30) = \cos(60) = \frac{1}{2}\,</math>
+::<math>\sin(60) = \cos(30) = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,</math>
+The three cube roots of 1, listed above, can all be seen to have moduli of 1 and phases of 0 degrees, 120 degrees, and 240 degrees respectively.  When raised to the third power, the phases are tripled, obtaining 0, 360, and 720 degrees.  But they are all the same angle&mdash;zero.  So the cubes of these numbers are all just one.  Similarly, <math>i\,</math> and <math>-i\,</math> have phases of 90 degrees and 270 degrees.  When those numbers are squared, the phases are 180 and 540, both of which are the same angle&mdash;180 degrees.  So their squares are both -1.
+One can apply this property to the n<sup>th</sup> roots of any complex number.  They lie equally spaced on a circle.  This is DeMoivre's theorem.
+[[File:Argandcbrt1.jpg|thumb|left|400px|The three cube roots of +1.]]
+[[File:Argandsqrtm1.jpg|thumb|right|400px|The two square roots of -1.]]
+{{clear}}
+===Euler's formula===
+A careful analysis of the power series for the exponential, sine, and cosine functions reveals the marvelous ''Euler formula'':
+:<math>z = r e^{i\theta}\,</math>
+of which there is the famous case (for &theta; = &pi;):
+:<math>e^{i\pi} = -1\,</math>
+==Conjugates==
+The ''complex conjugate'', or just ''conjugate'', of a complex number is the result of negating its imaginary part.  The conjugate is written with a bar over the quantity: <math>\overline{z}\,</math>.  All real numbers are their own conjugates.
+All arithmetic operations work naturally with conjugates&mdash;the sum of the conjugates is the conjugate of the sum, and so on.
+:<math>\overline{w+z} = \overline{w} + \overline{z}\,</math>
+:<math>\overline{w*z} = \overline{w} * \overline{z}\,</math>
+:<math>\overline{w/z} = \overline{w} / \overline{z}\,</math>
+It follows that, if P is a polynomial with real coefficients (so that its coefficients are their own conjugates)
+:<math>\overline{P(z)} = P(\overline{z})\,</math>
+If <math>z\,</math> is a root of a real polynomial, then, since zero is its own conjugate, <math>\overline{z}\,</math> is also a root.  This is often expressed as "Non-real roots of real polynomials come in conjugate pairs."  We saw that above for the cube roots of 1&mdash;two of the roots are complex and are conjugates of each other.  The third root is its own conjugate.
+==Transcendental functions==
+The higher mathematical functions (often called "transcendental functions"), like exponential, log, sine, cosine, etc., can be defined in terms of power series ([[Taylor series]]).  They can be extended to handle complex arguments in the completely natural way, so these functions are defined over the complex plane.  They are in fact "complex [[analytic function]]s".  Just about any normal function one can think of can be extended to the complex numbers, and is complex analytic.  Since the power series coefficients of the common functions are real, they work naturally with conjugates.  For example:
+:<math>\sin(\overline{z}) = \overline{\sin(z)}\,</math>
+:<math>\log(\overline{z}) = \overline{\log(z)}\,</math>
+==Complex functions==
+The general study of functions that take a complex argument and return a complex result is an extremely rich and useful area of mathematics, known as [[complex analysis]].  When such a function is differentiable, it is called a ''[[analytic function|complex analytic function]]'', or just ''analytic function''.
+==Applications==
+Complex numbers are extremely important in many areas of pure and applied mathematics and physics.  Basically, any description of oscillatory phenomena can benefit from a formulation in terms of complex numbers.
+The applications include these:
+*Theoretical mathematics:
+::'''algebra'''&mdash; (including finding roots of polynomials)
+::'''linear algebra'''&mdash;vector spaces, inner products, Hermitian and unitary operators, Hilbert spaces, etc.
+::'''eigenvalue/eigenvector problems'''<!-- Yes, listing it twice-->
+::'''number theory'''&mdash;This seems improbable, but it is true.  The Riemann zeta function, and the Riemann hypothesis, are very important in number theory.  For a long time, the only proofs of the prime number theorem used complex numbers.  The Wiles/Taylor proof of [[Fermat's Last Theorem]] uses modular forms, which use complex numbers.
+::'''trigonometry'''&mdash;finding arcsine and arccosine functions of numbers with [[absolute values]] more than 1 or arcsecant and arccosecant functions with absolute values between 0 and 1.
+*Applied mathematics
+::eigenvalue/eigenvector problems
+::Fourier and Laplace transforms
+::linear differential equations
+::stability theory
+*Electrical engineering
+::alternating current circuit analysis
+::filter design
+::antenna design
+*Theoretical physics
+::quantum mechanics
+::fundamental particle physics
+::electromagnetic radiation
+::optics
 [[Category:Mathematics]]
-[[category:complex analysis]]
+[[Category:Complex Analysis]]

Difference between revisions of "Complex number"

Latest revision as of 01:02, August 14, 2018

Contents

Arithmetic operations

Addition

Multiplication

Division

Fundamental theorem of algebra

Polar coordinates, modulus, and phase

Euler's formula

Conjugates

Transcendental functions

Complex functions

Applications

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Popular Links

donate

Edit Console