Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD NAMBLA"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:I think it could be a good article, but we should get rid of the logo as it somehow gives an air of legitimacy to pedophiles.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 16:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:I think it could be a good article, but we should get rid of the logo as it somehow gives an air of legitimacy to pedophiles.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 16:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Wow, a completely inarticulate reason. Okay, I say we do. But wait, we can't get rid of the logo, that is their official...thing. I am not a lawyer, but I believe we have every right to use it and ought to. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:27, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:27, 26 April 2007

We don't need it. RobS 16:22, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

I think it could be a good article, but we should get rid of the logo as it somehow gives an air of legitimacy to pedophiles.--JoyousOne 16:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Wow, a completely inarticulate reason. Okay, I say we do. But wait, we can't get rid of the logo, that is their official...thing. I am not a lawyer, but I believe we have every right to use it and ought to. Flippin 16:27, 26 April 2007 (EDT)