Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD NAMBLA"
From Conservapedia
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think it could be a good article, but we should get rid of the logo as it somehow gives an air of legitimacy to pedophiles.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 16:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | :I think it could be a good article, but we should get rid of the logo as it somehow gives an air of legitimacy to pedophiles.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 16:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Wow, a completely inarticulate reason. Okay, I say we do. But wait, we can't get rid of the logo, that is their official...thing. I am not a lawyer, but I believe we have every right to use it and ought to. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:27, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:27, April 26, 2007
We don't need it. RobS 16:22, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
- I think it could be a good article, but we should get rid of the logo as it somehow gives an air of legitimacy to pedophiles.--JoyousOne 16:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
- Wow, a completely inarticulate reason. Okay, I say we do. But wait, we can't get rid of the logo, that is their official...thing. I am not a lawyer, but I believe we have every right to use it and ought to. Flippin 16:27, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
