Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Abuse"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(He's a parody.)
m (Protected "Conservapedia:Abuse" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
 
(217 intermediate revisions by 55 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise. Unsigned posts will be removed.'''
+
#REDIRECT [[Conservapedia:Desk]]
__TOC__
+
Sysops, please move notes down to 'old alerts' once the incident is closed.
+
 
+
Archives:
+
[[Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive1|1]] [[Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive2|2]] [[Conservapedia:Abuse/Archive3|3]]
+
 
+
Other links:
+
*[[Conservapedia:Abuse|Abuse Reporting]]
+
*[[Conservapedia:Sysop and Admin Abuse|Administrative Abuse]]
+
*[[Conservapedia:Articles for Deletion|Articles for Deletion]]
+
*[[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates|Articles for Speedy Deletion]]
+
*[[User:CPanel|Conservapedia Panel]]
+
 
+
 
+
==Current Alerts==
+
*{{user|JoshuaZ}} Misleading edit summary + removed valid information from [[Noah]] article. Last 3 edits are questionable. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 05:11, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*ALERT:there are people on wikipedia planning to destroy you! There part of a "Cabal"? there members include the banned user icewedge. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hojimachong][[User:Tennis Sweatshirt|Tennis Sweatshirt]] 03:25, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
+
:"Cabal" is something of an in-joke, we only plan to destroy Conservapedia when something really annoying happens :-). Oh, and there is no cabal! ---[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 07:46, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*[[User:Staple]] -- vandalism and other questionable content.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:24, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
** Staple has many counterproductive edits, and potentially offensive ones by labeling users with categories.  I lengthened his block to 1 month.  I don't know anything about a "swastika" but feel free to make his block permanent if that is what it sounds like.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:35, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
***He had a swastika on his userpage[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
+
****The [[:Category:Liberal Users]] he created as a subcat of [[:Category:Communists]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Liberal_Users]; he & I were the only [[:Category:Conservative Users]] in that cat after he put a swastika on his User page.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Staple&diff=prev&oldid=132099] At a minimum this is incivility and trolling, and has little to do with his own use of his User page.  A permanent block is warranted.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 02:04, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
+
** Swastika alone justifies it.  Good block.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:33, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*[[User:Fred]] -- questionable edits intended to embarass CP. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Censorship&diff=prev&oldid=46203][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Separation_of_church_and_state&diff=prev&oldid=41507]  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:46, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*[[User:Terryeo]], Please block user if he causes problems at [[Dianetics]] or [[Scientology]]. See the relevant talk pages. I gave him a warning so far.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:18, 26 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
+
*{{user|GeorgeJ.W.}} keeps to add seemingly parodic, biased nonsense to articles, often attacking free software for being "communist". --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 19:50, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
+
: Silly edits by GeorgeJ.W., I agree.  Not quite enough to block him, but he's getting there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:38, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::They're parodic, Andy, not silly, unless he's an utterly ignorant moron. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 07:47, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Aydindrill}} Causing havoc. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]<sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 22:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
+
**'''Blocked''' by Aschlafly as a sock of icewedge. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 12:47, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Scorpion}}, vote fraud via sockpuppets. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]<sup><code>([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</code></sup> 21:53, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|CaptainCAVEMAN}} ought to be blocked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 10:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Hacker}} Review of Hacker's edits: slightly less than 500 edits, of which only about 6 are new entries and only about 10 are substantive edits of existing entries. One of the new entries was "Geek". Unless this improves quickly, I propose blocking this account because this violates the 90/10 rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:50, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::That seems disingenuous. Yes, he has only a few new pages, but he has made a number of templates. And, maybe I read the "total" incorrectly, but it said 307 edits? At the risk of sounding tautological, this user is quite useful, IMHO. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 10:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT) 
+
*{{user|Rvm}} first edit was reverted by MountainDew (I mean DanH). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:44, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Vossy}} created a weird article which someone else immediately blanked. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:22, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|AmeriCan}} - disinformation [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Rifle_Association&diff=prev&oldid=112288] -- [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:10, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:::If I may, AmeriCan included some incorrect information along with some that was partially correct. I am not sure this abuse at all. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:27, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*::::Also, he has a continuing habit of cut-paste from other sites.  See, for example his entry for [[Producerism]], copied in full from [http://en.allexperts.com/e/p/pr/producerism.htm].  His contributions to [[Canada]] and [[hijab]], among others, are similar cut/paste jobs.--[[User:WJThomas|WJThomas]] 18:59, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:Vandalized Ronald Reagan, sock of Coolhandsluke --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:Ilovebeingconservative (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 04:28, 17 April 2007) (Earliest: 04:19, 17 April 2007) [2]
+
*{{user|Sterile}} - 90/10 rule --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*Terreista and LambChop -blocked, socks of each other --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 16:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|ILikeCookies}} - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?
+
*#This edit to [[Dan Quayle]] wasn't too bad. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dan_Quayle&diff=prev&oldid=110148]
+
*The 6 random hex digit sock perp is back: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers [[User:Myk|Myk]] 13:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|GofG}} useless edits - warned
+
*{{user|Vyngarsson}} - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Resurrection&diff=prev&oldid=99990] for a good example.  Another example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=National_Rifle_Association&diff=103140&oldid=101324]
+
*{{user|Phiattiangel}} - 11 April 2007, trolling.
+
 
+
 
+
===Dealt with===
+
*[[User:Tenna]] -- made a video game page full of obscenity and slander. Recommend permanent ban--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 19:14, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
: Blocked.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:36, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*[[User:JeffersonDarcy]] -- linking to NAMBLA site. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=NAMBLA&diff=prev&oldid=129221]  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
+
**First, we know from Andy that linking to creepy sites is okay, even if you wouldn't put the material itself on CP (like the Silent Scream site).  Second, JeffersonDarcy is a very good contributor, and has helped with some of my law articles.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:22, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
+
**TOTALLY agree. You can't have it both ways, you know. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:24, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
+
Of course I linked to the NAMBLA site - the article was about NAMBLA.  Who do you think I should link to there, NAACP?  --[[User:JeffersonDarcy|JeffersonDarcy]] 16:34, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
+
***In the future, maybe you should get permission to place links to questionable content. Naughty naughty [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:36, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
+
****that's a fair concern - but when someone posts the necessity for citations on the discussion page, I don't think that linking to the organization's official website would be a bad idea.  --[[User:JeffersonDarcy|JeffersonDarcy]] 16:38, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
+
**The link could violate the Commandments, however this user's contributions do not show that this was anything more than a good faith attempt to improve the article. Therefore, '''No Block'''. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 12:46, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Truthandjustice}}
+
*#The reason given for Truthandjustice's block is: "'''Vandal'''") --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 00:37, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|AdamNelson}} new user making sudden, unexplained big changes 
+
*#---Ed, I saw it, about the same time Andy did.  He's gone --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 09:56, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*#09:49, 21 April 2007 TK (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "AdamNelson (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (Vandal & Per Andy
+
*{{user|AL}} off to a bad start --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:08, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*# 17:42, 19 April 2007 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "AL (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (made about a dozen edits in an hour, virtually all of which had to be reverted by others and myself because they removed factual info (e.g., SF entry) or inserted opinions as though they were facts (several instances))
+
*{{user|Nematocyte}} - warned not to annoy <s>TK</s> Terry.--[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:19, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:Ed, are you sure that TK has another problem with him? I am the one who has had problems with Nematocyte over my article [[Extraterrestrial life]].--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 12:26, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:I misunderstood I guess. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:23, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
+
* Dw1237200 sock of Ak1053287 (Who had a 3 day block by DanH starting on 12 April) got the second name on 13 April. Blocked, Infinite, both ID's.  --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 08:14, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|RightWolf2}} - threats, no useful edits --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:: I vote for a block.  I think he returned simply to threaten me, again.  I've requested an explanation from him on his talk page.  Who let him back?  It's OK this time, but pretty soon we'll need some accountability for those who unblock someone who becomes a problem again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:::Threatening, breaking the rules, blackmail... I'm no lawyer, but I don't think he has any legal grounds for his latest threat. I'll be blocking him. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 12:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*::::Isn't he already blocked? I got one of his socks earlier today. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:38, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*:::Didn't he admit to making overly polemic right-wing entries that he didn't really believe in himself awhile back to "test" the site? I remember getting into an argument with him about a month ago about his attempt to qualify Fred Phelps as a "leader in the pro-family movement". [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:48, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*::::You remember right, Dan. He's problematic. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 19:26, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*# 18:51, 21 March 2007 TimSvendsen (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked RightWolf2 (contribs)
+
*# 18:27, 21 March 2007 TK (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "RightWolf2 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 days (Disruption, Threats. I did this to take the responsibility off Hoji.)
+
*{{user|Jeremiah4-22}} -  for this edit http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Biscuit&diff=97586&oldid=78309 (Blocked for 3 days) [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:21, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Hillarycliton}} - blocked, all five contribs reverted --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:47, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Save Our Values}}
+
*#No contribs since 13 April --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:33, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|AppliedFaith}} -trolling, see [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Holocaust&diff=prev&oldid=104416][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heterosexuality&diff=prev&oldid=104363], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage."
+
*#I gave him a question to answer at [[talk:Heterosexuality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*#Blocked for ONE YEAR --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:45, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*[[User:AnonymousLegion]] - Vandalism--[[User:Epicurius|Epicurius]] 14:59, 4 April 2007 (EDT) --Blocked by --[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 18:44, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*[[User:Mjc12]] - blocked by Conservative
+
*{{user|Polarbear}} - Please check authenticity of comments and contribs---Blocked by [[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 00:01, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*TK blocked [[User:Cheney123|Cheney123]] (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandalism: "Democrats" )
+
*[[User:Theelephant]] - Vandalism--[[User:Epicurius|Epicurius]] 18:09, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*#18:09, 4 April 2007 Tsumetai blocked Theelephant (contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (obscenity)
+
*{{user|Cooperstown4}} - 9 April 2007, TK  blocked Cooperstown4  (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandal/Nonsense/Insults)
+
*{{user|Zac4213}} - Was my block too hasty?
+
*{{user|Jaques}}- Many recent edits very similar to Wikipedia and use exact same pictures, See [[Whale]] and [[Plankton]].
+
: Jaques is a frequent contributor and many of his entries are good.  The complaint would have to be more specific than this.  There is nothing wrong about copying public domain pictures, for example.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:23, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Mandolin2k}} - Joke entry (see "Jellystone")
+
*{{user|Godblessamerica}} - Copying from Wikipedia, prank edit here: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wales&diff=prev&oldid=105299]
+
*{{user|Hamtandrus}} -self identified Holocaust denier. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Holocaust_denial&diff=prev&oldid=105297]
+
::I think he's just being facetious.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 00:37, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::: He also says that he's 'done with this - place' [[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]
+
::::'''No block''' Holocaust denial isn't against the rules. <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 18:39, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|SRogers}} - anti-Semitism; see piped link Judaism|bankers in Federal Reserve article, for example [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve&diff=90085&oldid=81656] -- 6 month block, (Conduct detrimental to Conservapedia --[[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:31, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Sureal}} - altered [[RMS Titanic]] to blame liberals for the loss of the ship, as well as previous bad edits for which he was warned.  One week.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:52, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
+
*{{user|Homeschool mom}} lays it on too thick - suspected parodist
+
: Warned 4/15.  Awaiting response.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
+
:: No response.  Another user said that her edits are copies from Wikipedia.  Looks like we may have to block.  Give her another day to respond?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:46, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::: Homeschool mom agreed to leave on her own.  Case closed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:03, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
+

Latest revision as of 01:09, 2 June 2009

Redirect to: