Conservapedia:Abuse

This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise. Unsigned posts will be removed.

Sysops, please move notes down to 'old alerts' once the incident is closed.

Archives: 1 2 3

Other links:

• Abuse Reporting
• Administrative Abuse
• Articles for Deletion
• Articles for Speedy Deletion
• Conservapedia Panel

Current Alerts

• Aydindrill (talk • contribs • count) Causing havoc. Crocoite ^Talk 22:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
• Scorpion (talk • contribs • count), vote fraud via sockpuppets. --Hacker^{(Write some code • Support my RfA)} 21:53, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
• CaptainCAVEMAN (talk • contribs • count) ought to be blocked. Murray 10:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
• Hacker (talk • contribs • count) Review of Hacker's edits: slightly less than 500 edits, of which only about 6 are new entries and only about 10 are substantive edits of existing entries. One of the new entries was "Geek". Unless this improves quickly, I propose blocking this account because this violates the 90/10 rule.--Aschlafly 18:50, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

That seems disingenuous. Yes, he has only a few new pages, but he has made a number of templates. And, maybe I read the "total" incorrectly, but it said 307 edits? At the risk of sounding tautological, this user is quite useful, IMHO. Flippin 10:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

• Rvm (talk • contribs • count) first edit was reverted by MountainDew (I mean DanH). --Ed Poor 16:44, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
• Vossy (talk • contribs • count) created a weird article which someone else immediately blanked. --Ed Poor 17:22, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
• AmeriCan (talk • contribs • count) - disinformation [1] -- RobS 15:10, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  If I may, AmeriCan included some incorrect information along with some that was partially correct. I am not sure this abuse at all. Flippin 15:27, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  Also, he has a continuing habit of cut-paste from other sites. See, for example his entry for Producerism, copied in full from [2]. His contributions to Canada and hijab, among others, are similar cut/paste jobs.--WJThomas 18:59, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  Vandalized Ronald Reagan, sock of Coolhandsluke --~ ^Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 00:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  Ilovebeingconservative (Talk | contribs | block) (Latest: 04:28, 17 April 2007) (Earliest: 04:19, 17 April 2007) [2]

• Sterile (talk • contribs • count) - 90/10 rule --Ed Poor 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
• Terreista and LambChop -blocked, socks of each other --~ TK ^MyTalk 16:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
• ILikeCookies (talk • contribs • count) - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?
  1. This edit to Dan Quayle wasn't too bad. [3]
• The 6 random hex digit sock perp is back: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers Myk 13:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
• GofG (talk • contribs • count) useless edits - warned
• Vyngarsson (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [4] for a good example. Another example [5]
• Phiattiangel (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling.

Dealt with

• Truthandjustice (talk • contribs • count)
  1. The reason given for Truthandjustice's block is: "Vandal") --~ ^Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 00:37, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
• AdamNelson (talk • contribs • count) new user making sudden, unexplained big changes
  1. ---Ed, I saw it, about the same time Andy did. He's gone --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 09:56, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
  2. 09:49, 21 April 2007 TK (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "AdamNelson (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (Vandal & Per Andy
• AL (talk • contribs • count) off to a bad start --Ed Poor 17:08, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
  1. 17:42, 19 April 2007 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "AL (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (made about a dozen edits in an hour, virtually all of which had to be reverted by others and myself because they removed factual info (e.g., SF entry) or inserted opinions as though they were facts (several instances))
• Nematocyte (talk • contribs • count) - warned not to annoy TK Terry.--Ed Poor 12:19, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  Ed, are you sure that TK has another problem with him? I am the one who has had problems with Nematocyte over my article Extraterrestrial life.--TerryH^Talk 12:26, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  I misunderstood I guess. --Ed Poor 17:23, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

• Dw1237200 sock of Ak1053287 (Who had a 3 day block by DanH starting on 12 April) got the second name on 13 April. Blocked, Infinite, both ID's. --~ ^Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 08:14, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
• RightWolf2 (talk • contribs • count) - threats, no useful edits --Ed Poor 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

  I vote for a block. I think he returned simply to threaten me, again. I've requested an explanation from him on his talk page. Who let him back? It's OK this time, but pretty soon we'll need some accountability for those who unblock someone who becomes a problem again.--Aschlafly 18:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

  Threatening, breaking the rules, blackmail... I'm no lawyer, but I don't think he has any legal grounds for his latest threat. I'll be blocking him. --Hojimachong^talk 12:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  Isn't he already blocked? I got one of his socks earlier today. Tsumetai 12:38, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

  Didn't he admit to making overly polemic right-wing entries that he didn't really believe in himself awhile back to "test" the site? I remember getting into an argument with him about a month ago about his attempt to qualify Fred Phelps as a "leader in the pro-family movement". DanH 18:48, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

  You remember right, Dan. He's problematic. --~ TK ^MyTalk 19:26, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

  1. 18:51, 21 March 2007 TimSvendsen (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked RightWolf2 (contribs)
  2. 18:27, 21 March 2007 TK (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "RightWolf2 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 days (Disruption, Threats. I did this to take the responsibility off Hoji.)
• Jeremiah4-22 (talk • contribs • count) - for this edit http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Biscuit&diff=97586&oldid=78309 (Blocked for 3 days) DanH 14:21, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
• Hillarycliton (talk • contribs • count) - blocked, all five contribs reverted --Ed Poor 12:47, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
• Save Our Values (talk • contribs • count)
  1. No contribs since 13 April --Ed Poor 12:33, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
• AppliedFaith (talk • contribs • count) -trolling, see [6][7], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage."
  1. I gave him a question to answer at talk:Heterosexuality. --Ed Poor 16:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
  2. Blocked for ONE YEAR --Ed Poor 18:45, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
• User:AnonymousLegion - Vandalism--Epicurius 14:59, 4 April 2007 (EDT) --Blocked by --Elamdri 18:44, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
• User:Mjc12 - blocked by Conservative
• Polarbear (talk • contribs • count) - Please check authenticity of comments and contribs---Blocked by Elamdri 00:01, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
• TK blocked Cheney123 (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandalism: "Democrats" )
• User:Theelephant - Vandalism--Epicurius 18:09, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
  1. 18:09, 4 April 2007 Tsumetai blocked Theelephant (contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (obscenity)
• Cooperstown4 (talk • contribs • count) - 9 April 2007, TK blocked Cooperstown4 (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandal/Nonsense/Insults)
• Zac4213 (talk • contribs • count) - Was my block too hasty?
• Jaques (talk • contribs • count)- Many recent edits very similar to Wikipedia and use exact same pictures, See Whale and Plankton.

Jaques is a frequent contributor and many of his entries are good. The complaint would have to be more specific than this. There is nothing wrong about copying public domain pictures, for example.--Aschlafly 13:23, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

• Mandolin2k (talk • contribs • count) - Joke entry (see "Jellystone")
• Godblessamerica (talk • contribs • count) - Copying from Wikipedia, prank edit here: [8]
• Hamtandrus (talk • contribs • count) -self identified Holocaust denier. [9]

I think he's just being facetious.--Elamdri 00:37, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

He also says that he's 'done with this - place' Wikinterpreter

No block Holocaust denial isn't against the rules. Geo.Talk 18:39, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

• SRogers (talk • contribs • count) - anti-Semitism; see piped link Judaism|bankers in Federal Reserve article, for example [10] -- 6 month block, (Conduct detrimental to Conservapedia --RobS 15:31, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
• Sureal (talk • contribs • count) - altered RMS Titanic to blame liberals for the loss of the ship, as well as previous bad edits for which he was warned. One week. Karajou 18:52, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
• Homeschool mom (talk • contribs • count) lays it on too thick - suspected parodist

Warned 4/15. Awaiting response.--Aschlafly 13:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

No response. Another user said that her edits are copies from Wikipedia. Looks like we may have to block. Give her another day to respond?--Aschlafly 20:46, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

Homeschool mom agreed to leave on her own. Case closed.--Aschlafly 19:03, 19 April 2007 (EDT)