Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Featured articles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Proposed for featuring: Removed previously featured article (Sorry, Dean!))
(Proposed for featuring: vote)
Line 195: Line 195:
 
:*Agree. Perhaps move this out of order, given this is anniversary day? --[[User:TK|₮K]]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 13:08, 7 December 2008 (EST)
 
:*Agree. Perhaps move this out of order, given this is anniversary day? --[[User:TK|₮K]]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 13:08, 7 December 2008 (EST)
 
:*Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 13:46, 7 December 2008 (EST)
 
:*Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 13:46, 7 December 2008 (EST)
 +
:*Agree. I concur with TK even though this article is public domain material from the U.S. government. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:09, 7 December 2008 (EST)
 
}}
 
}}
  

Revision as of 21:09, December 7, 2008

Featured articles

Committee members

The Featured articles are posted on the Main Page each week. 35 articles have been featured to date. Articles may be submitted to the list of featured articles by listing them on this page. Please add them to the end of the list. Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.

Articles listed here will be considered for featuring by the committee. However, any editor may offer their own comments and are welcome to help improved listed articles.

Past articles

Featured articles. Past articles. 2007/08

Current article

Kosher

Future articles

The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.

Proposed for featuring

The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.

New suggestions can be added at the end of this list.

  • Agree. -Foxtrot 00:08, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
  • Agree. Good length, citations, and images. DuncanB 21:28, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
  • Agree. --TK 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 11:07, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree, but it needs a little work first. --DeanStalk 08:26, 2 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --TK 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree, been on the "Most Viewed Articles" list for a while now, but someone needs to work on the red links. JY23 20:39, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
  • Agree.DuncanTalk 07:31, 15 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --TK 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. Found very informative, anti-Communist topic, but far too many red links. #1denverfan 19:31, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
  • Disagree. --DeanStalk 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. A bit more work, will do it. --TK 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree --DeanStalk 01:04, 9 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree Bert Schlossberg 09:37, 12 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree --TK 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. Nice layout and uncumbersome. -Foxtrot 00:00, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
  • Disagree. Woefully inept and painfully inductive. 3 examples? I would rather make this my new project for expansion. --Limbo 00:13, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
  • Disagree. --DeanStalk 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
  • Agree. It has been improved. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 07:40, 15 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. Several redlinks, emphasis in the wrong place. JY23 16:49, 27 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --₮K/Talk! 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. Haven't had a science article in a while and this one seems fairly well-developed. -Foxtrot 00:00, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
  • Disagree. --DeanStalk 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
  • Disagree-- red links. DuncanTalk 07:31, 15 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. Too many red links for a featured article. --₮K/Talk! 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. Extremely well-written article, well sourced, no redlinks. This may be the most deserving article ever! JY23 18:34, 11 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 22:40, 11 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --₮K/Talk! 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Neutral. Fix the redlinks and it would be a good article, but the section lengths need some work. JY23 17:28, 16 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. --DeanStalk 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. One section, no photos, unimportant topic. JY23 17:21, 7 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. Way too short; I agree with JY23.DuncanTalk 07:31, 15 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. --DeanStalk 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. --₮K/Talk! 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree.DuncanTalk 07:31, 15 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --TK 06:02, 3 December 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. Reads like an essay, possibly should be moved to essay section. JY23 18:54, 12 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. --DeanStalk 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
  • Disagree. I think this was on Main Page before. --₮K/Talk! 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree, of course. This was not on main page. This was - Korean Airlines Flight 007. I think the remark above about this reading like an essay may be right. I just don't know the exact line between "essay" and "article". Can there be a "featured essay" as a "featured article"
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 08:26, 2 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. JY23 19:59, 2 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --TK 06:02, 3 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 07:30, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --₮K/Talk! 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. I'm impressed, this is a good article! JY23 19:00, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 05:38, 6 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree (I'm proposing it). Nicely illustrated and informative, and links to lots of other interesting pages about morality, literature, religion and mythology.--CPalmer 07:48, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --DeanStalk 09:32, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --₮K/Talk! 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. A lot of work's been put into this baby, I can tell. A job well done, guys! JY23 19:00, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Strongly agree. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 05:38, 6 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. JY23 19:01, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. Great analysis of the whole mess. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 05:38, 6 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree Geoff PlourdeComplain! 13:01, 7 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. Perhaps move this out of order, given this is anniversary day? --₮K/Talk! 13:08, 7 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 13:46, 7 December 2008 (EST)
  • Agree. I concur with TK even though this article is public domain material from the U.S. government. --DeanStalk 16:09, 7 December 2008 (EST)

Past Nominations

The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.