|
|
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | | |
| [[Featured articles. Past articles.]] '''2007/08''' | | [[Featured articles. Past articles.]] '''2007/08''' |
− |
| |
− | {{fa|Latino|hide=yes|
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 04:28, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. Thorough and lots of citations! -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:12, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 13:55, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | }}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{fa|Architecture|hide=yes|
| |
− | :*AGree. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*<s>Disagree. Lead section is too short. Individual sections need to be better developed. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:44, 3 July 2008 (EDT)</s> Agree due to massive rewrite [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:39, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Disagree. It's coverage of the topic is too limited, briefly describing different architectural styles, but nothing more. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:16, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. It has been improved. --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 20:33, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Still disagree, but... It still covers almost nothing except architectural styles. The description of architecture itself is limited to the first two sentences plus a further sentence quoting a dictionary definition. There's nothing about the goals of architecture, the methods that architects use, the profession of architecture, etc. If this article was moved to [[Architectural styles]], ''then'' perhaps it would be good enough to qualify. But for its current title, its coverage is still far too limited. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:49, 17 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Done. --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 11:02, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:01, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Disagree, per what Philip J. Rayment said. Anyone have anything about the actual origin of the term, or even the history of architecture? [[User:JY23|JY23]] 10:16, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | }}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{fa|United States Presidential Election, 2008|hide=yes|
| |
− | :* Agree. Wow, that's a lot of detail. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 20:08, 18 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Definitely agree. Great article! [[User:DuncanB|Duncan]]<sup>[[User talk:DuncanB|talk]]</sup> 10:44, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. We shouldn't lock the article though when it is presented. Daily changes are needed and it is edited by a number of non-sysops. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:20, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Wholeheartedly agree. This is one of the best articles I've read in a long time! [[User:JY23|JY23]] 09:38, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | }}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{fa|Great Flood|hide=yes|
| |
− | :* Agree, although the missing sections under ''Effects of the Flood'' should be filled in or removed. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:14, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 21:30, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. But it would be nice to finish the missing sections. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:01, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Disagree, one sentence sections. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:44, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | }}
| |
− | {{fa|Public transport|hide=yes|
| |
− | :* Agree (I did write it!) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:14, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. Good work! --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 22:35, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 16:16, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | }}
| |
− | {{fa|Shays' Rebellion|hide=yes|
| |
− | :* Agree [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 00:06, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:04, 9 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | }}
| |
− |
| |
− | [[Kosher]]
| |
− | :*Agree. [[User:BertSchlossberg|Bert Schlossberg]] 06:48, 13 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :*Agree. [[User:Deborah|Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]] 16:57, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*I did a major expansion of this article http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher&diff=489072&oldid=457560 --<span style="margin-top: -3px;"> [[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah|Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 14:24, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Agree. I found this interesting and learned from it. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 21:30, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Agree. Well-researched article. [[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:01, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Agree. Found very informative, well written, an essential topic in our world. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 21:36, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Neutral [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:44, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | {{fa|George Washington|
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 11:07, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :* Agree, but it needs a little work first. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 08:26, 2 December 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :*Agree. --[[User:TK|TK]] 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
| |
− | }}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{fa|Judaism|
| |
− | :* Agree --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:04, 9 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :* Agree [[User:BertSchlossberg|Bert Schlossberg]] 09:37, 12 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :* Agree --[[User:TK|TK]] 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
| |
− | }}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{fa|F/A-18 Hornet|
| |
− | :* Agree, been on the "Most Viewed Articles" list for a while now, but someone needs to work on the red links. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 20:39, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Agree.[[User:DuncanB|Duncan]]<sup>[[User talk:DuncanB|Talk]]</sup> 07:31, 15 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:TK|TK]] 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
| |
− | }}
| |
− | {{fa|Noh theater|
| |
− | :* Agree. Extremely well-written article, well sourced, no redlinks. This may be the most deserving article ever! [[User:JY23|JY23]] 18:34, 11 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :* Agree. --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 22:40, 11 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :*Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :*Agree. --[[User:TK|₮K]]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
| |
− | }}
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | {{fa|Literature|
| |
− | :* Agree. Nice layout and uncumbersome. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:00, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :* Disagree. Woefully inept and painfully inductive. 3 examples? I would rather make this my new project for expansion. --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 00:13, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
− | :*Agree. It has been improved. --[[User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez]], [[User talk:JoaquÃn MartÃnez|talk]] 07:40, 15 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :*Disagree. Several redlinks, emphasis in the wrong place. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 16:49, 27 November 2008 (EST)
| |
− | :*Agree. --[[User:TK|₮K]]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
| |
− | }}
| |
| | | |
| == Current article == | | == Current article == |
Articles listed here will be considered for featuring by the committee.
However, any editor may offer their own comments and are welcome to help improved listed articles.
The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.
The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.
The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.