|
|
| Line 176: |
Line 176: |
| | The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the ''show'' link after each entry to see why it was rejected. | | The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the ''show'' link after each entry to see why it was rejected. |
| | | | |
| − | {{fa|Riemann integral|hide=yes|
| + | [[Past Nominations 08-09]] |
| − | :*Agree. A math article with detailed explanation and examples. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:27, 1 March 2009 (EST)
| + | |
| − | :*Disagree. It is certainly detailed, but seems to explain things at a fairly advanced level (but that is a non-math person speaking). Also, items that seem necessary for the proof (Square pyramidal numbers, etc) are redlinks. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:46, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 2 April 2009 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | }}
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | {{fa|Colorado Springs|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short; a good start but needs more info; too many red links. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 21:21, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:29, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:09, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Johns Hopkins University|hide=true|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Underdeveloped. [[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:01, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*'''Disagree''' Unfortunately this article is far too short to feature at this time. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 19:35, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:29, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Amused To Death|hide=true|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Unimportant topic and drug influenced album. This isn't Wikipedia. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:10, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Poorly written, unimportant topic. Serious rewrite needed before featuring. [[User:JY23|#1denverfan]] 19:32, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:49, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree, per what #1denverfan said. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:13, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Battle of Gettysburg|hide=true|
| |
| − | :*Disagree; I do not feel that this article fully covers the battle, particularly the 20th Maine. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 00:06, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Agree. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:08, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 00:16, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree; I do not think that public domain material from the U.S. government should be featured material (such as country articles, ship articles, etc) unless the article has been extensively re-worked by any of the editors to make it better. [[Mexico]] (see above) may fall into that category. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:06, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree, for the same reason as Karajou, and in fact we rejected this article once before for the same reason, so I'm moving it to the "Past nominations" section now. Now that we have that "Past nominations" sections, hopefully this won't happen again with this article.
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Sausage|hide=true|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :* Disagree. No references despite questionable statements and too many red links. I don't think the length is a problem. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]]
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Nothing against sausages, but hardly a front page Big Theme. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:00, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 20:09, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. [[User:Joaquín Martínez]]
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{fa|Deconstruction|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Unimportant topic of interest mostly to liberals. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Important topic, but not described correctly. Article contains at least one contradiction ("reader response" both wrong and right). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 09:14, 26 August 2008 (EDT) Fixed red links and improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 00:16, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. I'm not qualified to judge it's accuracy, but it is too obscure and not written at a suitable level. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:24, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Not long enough, too many red links, not nearly enough images that explain the text, I just didn't understand what was going on in that article. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 21:31, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:01, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{fa|Holy Days|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too short. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:29, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :* Agree, will be improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 09:21, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree, too short, far too many red links [[User:JY23|JY23]] 18:31, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Neutral. Would like to see what it looks like after more information added; it could be a good article. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:02, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree for now. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 14:01, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:44, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{fa|Liberty Bell|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Agree. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 22:36, 7 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Essential topic, but far too short. Anything about the history of the Bell that someone can put? [[User:JY23|JY23]] 21:37, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Vitamin C|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Agree. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 22:36, 7 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*<s>Agree. Didn't realize I had to voice agreement when I added it to the list. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:08, 28 September 2008 (EDT)</s> Disagree. Now that the copywritten text has been removed this article is hardly as comprehensive. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 21:06, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:44, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree-hardly a good theme and way too short. Far too many red links. [[User:DuncanB|Duncan]]<sup>[[User talk:DuncanB|talk]]</sup> 10:42, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Operation Iraqi Freedom|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Agree. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:08, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Agree. Good length, citations, and images. [[User:DuncanB|DuncanB]] 21:28, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Agree. --[[User:TK|TK]] 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Alger Hiss|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :* Agree. Found very informative, anti-Communist topic, but far too many red links. [[User:JY23|#1denverfan]] 19:31, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :* Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :* Disagree. A bit more work, will do it. --[[User:TK|TK]] 05:56, 3 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Physics|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :* Agree. Haven't had a science article in a while and this one seems fairly well-developed. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:00, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 01:22, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree-- red links. [[User:DuncanB|Duncan]]<sup>[[User talk:DuncanB|Talk]]</sup> 07:31, 15 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Too many red links for a featured article. --[[User:TK|₮K]]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Bible history|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :* Neutral. Fix the redlinks and it would be a good article, but the section lengths need some work. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 17:28, 16 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|Robert Heinlein|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. One section, no photos, unimportant topic. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 17:21, 7 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. ''Way'' too short; I agree with JY23.[[User:DuncanB|Duncan]]<sup>[[User talk:DuncanB|Talk]]</sup> 07:31, 15 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:TK|₮K]]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{fa|KAL 007 Survivors and the Forced Labor Concentration Camps of the Russian Federation|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Reads like an essay, possibly should be moved to essay section. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 18:54, 12 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 11:00, 28 November 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. I think this was on Main Page before. --[[User:TK|₮K]]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 13:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
| |
| − | :*Agree, of course. This was not on main page. This was - [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]]. I think the remark above about this reading like an essay may be right. I just don't know the exact line between "essay" and "article". Can there be a "featured essay" as a "featured article"
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{fa|A-7 Corsair II|hide=yes|
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Reads too much like a schematic. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:26, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. Not a bad article per se, but not convinced it is worthy of front page. Maybe with an expansion of the history of the plane? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 06:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | :*Disagree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 07:18, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | }}
| |
| | | | |
| | [[Category: Conservapedia Administration]] | | [[Category: Conservapedia Administration]] |
Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.
The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.
The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.
The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.
