Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Featured articles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Current article)
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 
== Future articles ==
 
== Future articles ==
 +
 +
{{fa|Third Reich|}}
 +
: * Agree. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)
 +
: * Agree. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:25, 7 March 2010 (EST)
  
 
== Proposed for featuring ==
 
== Proposed for featuring ==
Line 82: Line 86:
 
: * Agree. Conciseness is a conservative virtue. Besides featuring might spur improvement! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)
 
: * Agree. Conciseness is a conservative virtue. Besides featuring might spur improvement! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)
  
{{fa|Third Reich|}}
 
: * Agree. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)
 
: * Agree. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:25, 7 March 2010 (EST)
 
  
 
{{fa|George Patton|}}
 
{{fa|George Patton|}}

Revision as of 19:31, March 7, 2010

Featured articles

Committee Members

The Featured articles are posted on the Main Page each week.

Articles may be submitted to the list of featured articles by listing them on the talk page. Please add them to the end of the list.

Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.

  • Articles listed here will be considered for featuring and voted on by the committee members. Editors may offer their own comments (on the talk page) and are welcome to help improve the listed articles!


Past articles

Featured articles. Past articles. 2007/08

Featured articles. Past articles 2009 2009


Current article

* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 09:38, 17 February 2010 (EST) . After a suggestion of User:Daniel1212.
* Agree. --Jpatt 15:50, 27 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)

Future articles

* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:25, 7 March 2010 (EST)

Proposed for featuring

The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.

New suggestions can be added at the end of this list.

The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.

* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 07:34, 18 January 2010 (EST)
* Disagree: this is not up to our standards in economic history. It is unaware of all the work conservative historians have done.RJJensen 11:46, 18 January 2010 (EST)
* Disagree: what RJ said --Jpatt 15:50, 27 February 2010 (EST)
* Disagree. Too short --Jpatt 16:28, 27 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. Conciseness is a conservative virtue. Besides featuring might spur improvement! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)


* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:25, 7 March 2010 (EST)
* Agree. in recognition of the 100th year --Jpatt 15:50, 27 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. Rob Smith 15:34, 5 March 2010 (EST)
* Agree. Cash in on the Yahoo rankings. Rob Smith 16:12, 28 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:25, 7 March 2010 (EST)
* Agree. --Jpatt 15:50, 27 February 2010 (EST)
* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)

Past Nominations

The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.

Conservapedia:Featured articles/Past Nominations 08-09