Conservapedia:Featured articles

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joaquín Martínez (Talk | contribs) at 13:01, January 25, 2010. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Featured articles

Committee members

The Featured articles are posted on the Main Page each week.

Articles may be submitted to the list of featured articles by listing them on the talk page. Please add them to the end of the list.

Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.

    • Articles listed here will be considered for featuring and voted on by the committee members. Editors may offer their own comments (on the talk page) and are welcome to help improve the listed articles!


Past articles

Featured articles. Past articles. 2007/08

Featured articles. Past articles 2009 2009

* Agree. --RJJensen 19:48, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. AddisonDM 20:54, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --RJJensen 19:48, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --RJJensen 19:48, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree, too short right now. Good candidate in the future. AddisonDM 20:54, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. I love it and I will add more content.--Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 07:59, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. AddisonDM 20:54, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 23:32, 12 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree, on condition that it is read through and perhaps beefed up a bit (some of the words may be added by random editors and not conservative) AddisonDM 20:53, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. For exactly one-year away November.--Jpatt 14:56, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. But let's not wait so long. The campaigns are underway and we want people to use this article to follow them. I suggest using it right after the Nov. 3 2009 elections when elections are in the news.RJJensen 00:14, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. Please make next possible featured article, per Jensen's s reasoning. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:40, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 19:24, 4 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --RJJensen 20:36, 4 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:56, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:38, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree. The table of contents is bloated and overgrown. For past games, there should be a table with links to separate pages for each Olympics. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 21:12, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 19:32, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. Locked article pending featuring, guard against inflamatory language. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:38, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. Excellent and informative overview. The list would look a lot cleaner in a table, as an idea for improvement. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 21:05, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 13:12, 7 November 2009 (EST)
* Agree! AddisonDM 20:53, 21 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. It should be shown in conjunction with the next event. Retract, good boost of morale between events --Jpatt 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:38, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree. Rewrite the lead to begin with an overview of what the movement is. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 21:06, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree:--Jpatt 22:38, 14 November 2009 (EST)
* Agree:--Geoff PlourdeComplain! 00:35, 28 November 2009 (EST)
* Agree. --Jpatt 14:56, 14 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:38, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree. Needs more information. Establishment and Reformation sections are redundant and should be combined and expanded. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 21:12, 27 October 2009 (EDT)
* Agree:----RJJensen 13:20, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----Joaquín Martínez 17:08, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----Jpatt 11:33, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----RJJensen 13:20, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----Joaquín Martínez 16:08, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----ṬK/Admin/Talk 07:17, 16 January 2010 (EST)
* Agree:----Jpatt 11:33, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----RJJensen 13:20, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:------Joaquín Martínez 16:10, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:--Jpatt 13:12, 7 November 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----Joaquín Martínez 16:58, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----Jpatt 11:33, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:----RJJensen 13:20, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:------Joaquín Martínez 16:08, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree------ṬK/Admin/Talk 07:17, 16 January 2010 (EST)

Current article

Future articles

* Agree:----Jpatt 00:19, 19 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:------ṬK/Admin/Talk 07:17, 16 January 2010 (EST)
* Agree:----Geoff PlourdeComplain! 19:41, 16 January 2010 (EST)
* Agree:----RJJensen 16:42, 24 January 2010 (EST)
* Agree:----Joaquín Martínez
* Agree:----ṬK/Admin/Talk 16:38, 24 January 2010 (EST)
* Agree:----RJJensen 16:42, 24 January 2010 (EST)

Proposed for featuring

The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.

New suggestions can be added at the end of this list.

The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.

* Agree:----Jpatt 00:19, 19 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:------ṬK/Admin/Talk 07:17, 16 January 2010 (EST)
  • Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 07:34, 18 January 2010 (EST)
* Disagree: this is not up to our standards in economic history. It is unaware of all the work conservative historians have done.RJJensen 11:46, 18 January 2010 (EST)

Past Nominations

The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.

Conservapedia:Featured articles/Past Nominations 08-09

* Agree:----Jpatt 11:33, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Disagree:----too long winded and out of date; needs to be trimmed and focused on House RJJensen 13:20, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Agree:------Joaquín Martínez 16:08, 15 December 2009 (EST)
* Disagree: This is copied from a government document. Compare the companion article that I wrote: Gettysburg Campaign----RJJensen 03:27, 16 December 2009 (EST)
* Disagree: I posted the request but I like the Gettysburg Campaign!--Jpatt 00:19, 19 December 2009 (EST)