Conservapedia:Featured articles

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joaquín Martínez (Talk | contribs) at 18:55, July 10, 2009. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Featured articles

Committee members

The Featured articles are posted on the Main Page each week.

Articles may be submitted to the list of featured articles by listing them on the talk page. Please add them to the end of the list.

Articles will normally be featured in the order listed, but the order may be changed by the committee in some cases.

    • Articles listed here will be considered for featuring and voted on by the committee members. Editors may offer their own comments (on the talk page) and are welcome to help improve the listed articles!


Past articles

Featured articles. Past articles. 2007/08

Featured articles. Past articles 2009 2009

* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 08:34, 24 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --DeanStalk 12:17, 24 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --₮K/Admin/Talk 15:10, 24 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 9:15, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 08:34, 24 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --DeanStalk 12:17, 24 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --₮K/Admin/Talk 15:10, 24 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 9:15, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --RJJensen 13:50, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 10:59, 5 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 12:55, 5 June 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree. Too many red links. --DeanStalk 15:57, 5 June 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree. I rewrote and expanded it but think people should revote on it. --RJJensen 13:50, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --₮K/Admin/Talk 15:10, 24 May 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Jpatt 9:15, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree. Too many red links. --DeanStalk 13:01, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
* Disagree. Red links; too much summary of plot and too little explanation. --RJJensen 13:50, 8 June 2009 (EDT)

Current article

* Agree. Good article for the week of her hearings in July --Jpatt 17:12, 18 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 20:23, 18 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. Very good idea. AddisonDM 22:16, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. Very good idea. RJJensen 05:00, 20 June 2009 (EDT)

Future articles

The following articles should be checked for any improvements that can be made before they are posted to the Main Page.

Proposed for featuring

The following articles will probably be moved to the list above in the order listed if nobody has any objection or alternative suggestion.

New suggestions can be added at the end of this list.

* Agree. No. 2 in Google among 1,750,000. --Joaquín Martínez 23:02, 7 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. Stunningly attractive!! --RJJensen 13:50, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. Why have I noticed this before?--Jpatt 18:50, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. That must be one of our nicer art entries! AddisonDM 19:11, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. RJ, that is some great work! --Jpatt 23:27, 11 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 21:08, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
* Agree. AddisonDM 19:11, 16 June 2009 (EDT)






* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 14:52, 10 July 2009 (EDT)


* Agree. --Joaquín Martínez 14:52, 10 July 2009 (EDT)


* Agree, but it has already been selected; on 07/03/08. --Joaquín Martínez 14:52, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

Past Nominations

The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring. Click the show link after each entry to see why it was rejected.

Conservapedia:Featured articles/Past Nominations 08-09