Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Ideological blocking"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Counterargument)
(definition is needed)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Ideological blocking''', officially forbidden at Conservapedia, nonetheless is alleged to be happening. Some of the accusations may be malicious; others may mistake blocking for disruptive editing and for sterile arguing designed to delay and undermine Conservapedia for ideological blocks.
+
'''Ideological blocking''', officially forbidden at Conservapedia, nonetheless is alleged to be happening.  
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 +
 +
Some of the accusations may be malicious; others may mistake blocking for disruptive editing and for sterile arguing designed to delay and undermine Conservapedia for ideological blocks. Therefore a clear definition is required, so claims can be evaluated.
  
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
  
 
Feel free to add incidents where a user has been blocked on ideological grounds.
 
Feel free to add incidents where a user has been blocked on ideological grounds.

Revision as of 17:24, November 25, 2008

Ideological blocking, officially forbidden at Conservapedia, nonetheless is alleged to be happening.

Definition

Some of the accusations may be malicious; others may mistake blocking for disruptive editing and for sterile arguing designed to delay and undermine Conservapedia for ideological blocks. Therefore a clear definition is required, so claims can be evaluated.

Examples

Feel free to add incidents where a user has been blocked on ideological grounds.