Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation

Quick Links Abuse Reporting Administrative Abuse Conservapedia Panel

This is where you can report abuse by Sysops. Please make notes short and concise. Do not piggyback! One new header per complaint. Unsigned posts will be removed. Click here to file a complaint.

Archives Archive 1

Fox

Fox was barred for protesting against an inaccurate and offensive article. He should be reinstated at once, preferably with an apology from the sysop who sought to stifle freedom of speech in such an arbitrary and high handed manner. Pachyderm 10:46, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

You need to remember that this is CP. If Fox sais something out of line with CP's principles, he should have been banned.--Fbaker 11:02, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

• Fox was blocked for a total of 24 hours, by me originally, and that was removed a mere 6 hours, if that, into it. Because of the "article" Fox got at me on YIM, and asked that his account be deleted. I have seen at least one edit from him since the block was removed, so it doesn't seem he has left to me. --Sysop-TK _/MyTalk 05:17, 15 June 2007 (EDT)

Crippes blocking

Crippes was a positive user with some good edits, but was still blocked. Duddgydids 16:52, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

Crippes was blocked for creating a sock which caused some vandalism. Karajou 16:58, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

How would Duddgydids know--Duddgydids been here awhole two minutes. RobS 17:00, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

Quite possibly because he's a sock from the same source. Karajou 17:01, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

I'm not the same as "Carlowcrab", Duddgydids 17:05, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

Then what is your purpose here? Karajou 17:08, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

User:Aschlafly

This administrator reverted twice, without justification, an edit to Talk:Shaken Baby Syndrome[1]. I think that this is an abuse of sysop powers. ...RingWraith 19:53, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Reverting isn't even a sysop power - anyone can do that. The first site that SSchultz used is inappropriate for CP - SSchultz was adequately warned of that the first time he posted.--IDuan 19:58, 12 January 2008 (EST)

How is that site not appropriate? It is merely a list of journals that are not recognized as legitimate, and I doubt anybody would want to cite on of those journals. And I recognize that reverting is not an administrator power, but I think this admin is using his position to intimidate SScultz. ...RingWraith 20:00, 12 January 2008 (EST)

For starters there's apparently no legitimacy to that site ("I consider") and also the site's url is also an attack--IDuan 20:03, 12 January 2008 (EST)

There is also no record of this admin warning SScultz... the users talk page does not exist, and there was no warning at Talk:Shaken Baby Syndrome. ...RingWraith 20:04, 12 January 2008 (EST)

The record isn't there - as the page was deleted - however I saw the warning prior to the block, and those with sysop privileges can see the history of deleted pages, so they could also see that.--IDuan 20:08, 12 January 2008 (EST)