Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Article Improvement Drive"
From Conservapedia
Hojimachong (Talk | contribs) |
(→Voting) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I guess my question is sorta related. Is the purpose of this Drive to fix articles up for featured status or to select articles to be featured? If the former, I believe [[Bible]] is closed to editing. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:04, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | :I guess my question is sorta related. Is the purpose of this Drive to fix articles up for featured status or to select articles to be featured? If the former, I believe [[Bible]] is closed to editing. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:04, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::You may vote for as many articles as you wish. This project is to improve the quality of the articles to bring them up to a featured article status, not to select featured articles. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 23:05, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ::You may vote for as many articles as you wish. This project is to improve the quality of the articles to bring them up to a featured article status, not to select featured articles. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 23:05, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I just closed the [[Bible]] when a vandal came along and had his way with it. I am opening to it being edited by others, but there has to be some standards adhered to when the editing takes place, namely the article as it stands has to be ''about'' the Bible and it's direct history; the criticism of the Bible, the opposing views of it's authenticity, stuff like that, need separate articles specifically about those subjects. I did it that way, not because I'm a Bible-believer (and I am), but the fact that when there's just too much side-tracking in an article, then the article loses focus. This also applies to many other subjects besides the Bible. What say you? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:23, March 17, 2007
Voting
Can one vote for more than one article? I have no problem with any of the articles mentioned. I nominated the Germany article more to call to attention the fact that it really is in pretty bad shape, and conceivably created by somebody with less than serious intentions. MountainDew 23:03, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
- I guess my question is sorta related. Is the purpose of this Drive to fix articles up for featured status or to select articles to be featured? If the former, I believe Bible is closed to editing. Myk 23:04, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
- You may vote for as many articles as you wish. This project is to improve the quality of the articles to bring them up to a featured article status, not to select featured articles. --Hojimachongtalk 23:05, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
- I just closed the Bible when a vandal came along and had his way with it. I am opening to it being edited by others, but there has to be some standards adhered to when the editing takes place, namely the article as it stands has to be about the Bible and it's direct history; the criticism of the Bible, the opposing views of it's authenticity, stuff like that, need separate articles specifically about those subjects. I did it that way, not because I'm a Bible-believer (and I am), but the fact that when there's just too much side-tracking in an article, then the article loses focus. This also applies to many other subjects besides the Bible. What say you? Karajou 23:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
