Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Guard dog"

Revision as of 02:05, March 12, 2009

Needs to be a bit "smarter", methinks. --MakeTomorrow 13:02, 9 February 2008 (EST)

You made 9 edits in 1 minute. It's probably pretty hard to program a system smart enough to tell when you are simply testing its limits and not, in fact, a botspammer... HelpJazz 13:22, 9 February 2008 (EST)

To the contrary, it need only look at the kind of changes that are being made. Significantly harder to write, admittedly, but that's a price that must be paid. --MakeTomorrow 13:25, 9 February 2008 (EST)

In fact, I would see if a copy of the AVB from Wikipedia could be procured. --MakeTomorrow 13:26, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Regardless, in no normal circumstances should users make that many edits in a short period of time. In fact, I'm not sure I could find a page, make decide what edit needs to be made, make said edit, and save the page all in under 6 seconds. Even when you go through and fix categories you can't go that fast. I would say that anyone who makes that many edits in 1 minute should be slowed down. HelpJazz 13:32, 9 February 2008 (EST)

One word: Tabs. Absentismens 17:35, 9 February 2008 (EST)

I know how it's done, but there's no practical reason to do it that way. If you are going to open up the tabs beforehand, why not just make the edit right then? At my very fastest and most efficient I've ever been able to be (and I've done a lot of routine "maintenance" work) is maybe a third of that rate. Maybe if the pages loaded instantly I could go twice as fast, but that's still only 6 edits a minute. HelpJazz 18:06, 9 February 2008 (EST)

To tell the truth, I was testing it… --MakeTomorrow 18:16, 9 February 2008 (EST)

I know :) HelpJazz 21:19, 9 February 2008 (EST)

Name?

• We should name the Guard Dog. I'm thinking "Fluffy." -CSGuy 22:05, 11 March 2009 (EDT)