Difference between revisions of "Council on Foreign Relations"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Support for globalism and one-world government)
(Support for globalism and one-world government: Add.)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
According to Edith Kermit Roosevelt, the granddaughter of [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the CFR's goal is "a One World Socialist state governed by 'experts' like themselves."<ref name="Perloff2009"/> According to Admiral Chester Ward, a former Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy who was a member of the CFR for 16 years before resigning in disgust, "the main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government."<ref name="Perloff2009"/>
 
According to Edith Kermit Roosevelt, the granddaughter of [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the CFR's goal is "a One World Socialist state governed by 'experts' like themselves."<ref name="Perloff2009"/> According to Admiral Chester Ward, a former Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy who was a member of the CFR for 16 years before resigning in disgust, "the main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government."<ref name="Perloff2009"/>
 +
 +
CFR members have openly voiced their support for world government and globalism. CFR President Richard Haass has stated that "states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function."<ref name="Doha2012">Jasper, William F. (December 4, 2012). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/13825 CFR Pushes End to Sovereignty at UN's Doha Climate Summit]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 1, 2018.</ref> The CFR, including Haass, have used [[climate change]] alarmism as an excuse for doing away with [[national sovereignty]] and promoting [[globalism]].<ref name="Doha2012"/>
  
 
The [[Trilateral Commission]] was founded in 1973 in order to coordinate the globalist CFR agenda in the U.S. with similar organizations in Europe and Asia.<ref name="Perloff2009"/> These globalists decided to create regional alliances such as [[NAFTA]] and the [[European Union]] as a steppingstone for a world government.<ref name="Perloff2009"/>
 
The [[Trilateral Commission]] was founded in 1973 in order to coordinate the globalist CFR agenda in the U.S. with similar organizations in Europe and Asia.<ref name="Perloff2009"/> These globalists decided to create regional alliances such as [[NAFTA]] and the [[European Union]] as a steppingstone for a world government.<ref name="Perloff2009"/>
 +
 +
The exposure of the CFR's director of Latin American studies, Julia Sweig, who was revealed to have supported far-left dictators and terrorists and attacking the Second Amendment, helps illustrate the left-wing positions of the CFR.<ref>Newman, Alex (October 7, 2013). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/south-america/item/16693-exposure-of-radical-cfr-latin-america-boss-offers-broad-insight Exposure of Radical CFR Latin America Boss Offers Broad Insight]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 1, 2017.</ref>
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 03:46, January 2, 2018

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is a globalist international organization founded in 1921, which has long promoted the involvement of the United States in other nations and the protection of international business interests.[1] The CFR seeks to influence American politics by inviting presidential candidates to speak at its events and by encouraging potentially influential businessmen, lawyers and government officials to join its organization or participate in its events. Many American presidents have spoken at CFR events.

It publishes a bi-monthly journal entitled Foreign Affairs, which has long been influential in some political circles.

Membership in the CFR is complex procedure designed to ensure continuation of its globalist vision.[2] President Ronald Reagan was unusual among leading American politicians in shunning the CFR. Cong. Larry McDonald of Georgia was another strong opponent of the CFR.

The "power behind the throne"

See also: Deep state

The CFR has welded a very large amount of power in U.S. and international politics, and some of its conservative critics have described it as "the most visible manifestation of" the establishment.[3] The CFR has many members from many different fields and in both U.S. political parties.[4] CFR members have "dominated" each U.S. presidential administration since Franklin D. Roosevelt, irrespective of whether each administration was Republican or Democrat.[3] By mid-2009, 21 secretaries of defense or war, 19 secretaries of the treasury, 17 secretaries of state, and 15 CIA directors had been CFR members.[3] Thus, coupled with the other globalist organizations, such as the Trilateral Commission, that Republican and Democrat administrations consistently relied upon for appointees, one can see why succeeding administrations failed to bring change that they had promised while on the campaign trail.[3]

In 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted the CFR's massive influence in the U.S. government, stating that "we get a lot of advice from the Council, so this [CFR headquarters move] will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future."[5]

Even U.S. President Donald Trump's administration was not free from CFR influence. Several important Trump Administration members, including National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster (who replaced non-CFR member Mike Flynn) and Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. Other appointees, including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, have friendly relations with the CFR.[6] These CFR members in the Trump Administration – including those handpicked by Trump – worked to undermine Trump's America First policies. This is seen by the Trump Administration's National Security Strategy, written by CFR members McMaster and Nadia Schadlow, which globalist never Trumpers and CFR members praised.[7]

Support for globalism and one-world government

See also: War on Sovereignty and One-world government

The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921, shortly after the United States rejected membership in the League of Nations.[3] The founders, who included the Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild families, wanted to use the organization "to lead America into the League."[3] Ever since, the CFR has been pushing for globalist and one-world policies.[3]

Many globalist international organizations, including the United Nations, World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund, where created in large part by CFR members and used to help bring about a system of global governance.[3] Additionally, the Vietnam War and the disastrous strategies that fueled the rise of the New Left were engineered by CFR members in the U.S. government.[3]

According to Edith Kermit Roosevelt, the granddaughter of Theodore Roosevelt, the CFR's goal is "a One World Socialist state governed by 'experts' like themselves."[3] According to Admiral Chester Ward, a former Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy who was a member of the CFR for 16 years before resigning in disgust, "the main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government."[3]

CFR members have openly voiced their support for world government and globalism. CFR President Richard Haass has stated that "states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function."[8] The CFR, including Haass, have used climate change alarmism as an excuse for doing away with national sovereignty and promoting globalism.[8]

The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 in order to coordinate the globalist CFR agenda in the U.S. with similar organizations in Europe and Asia.[3] These globalists decided to create regional alliances such as NAFTA and the European Union as a steppingstone for a world government.[3]

The exposure of the CFR's director of Latin American studies, Julia Sweig, who was revealed to have supported far-left dictators and terrorists and attacking the Second Amendment, helps illustrate the left-wing positions of the CFR.[9]

See also

References

  1. http://www.cfr.org/about/
  2. http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 Perloff, James (July 23, 2009). Council On Foreign Relations. The New American. Retrieved December 31, 2017.
  4. Newman, Alex (October 30, 2017). Deep State Behind the Deep State: CFR, Trilaterals, Bilderberg. The New American. Retrieved December 21, 2017.
  5. McManus, John F. (July 17, 2009). Hillary Clinton Lets CFR Cat Out of the Bag. The New American. Retrieved December 31, 2017.
  6. Multiple references:
  7. Jasper, William F. (December 29, 2017). Deep State Boasts: We’re Sabotaging Trump From the Inside. The New American. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Jasper, William F. (December 4, 2012). CFR Pushes End to Sovereignty at UN's Doha Climate Summit. The New American. Retrieved January 1, 2018.
  9. Newman, Alex (October 7, 2013). Exposure of Radical CFR Latin America Boss Offers Broad Insight. The New American. Retrieved January 1, 2017.