Difference between revisions of "Deadweight loss"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(undeadend)
m (Reverted edits by Bibleculpepper (Talk) to last revision by Aschlafly)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A deadweight loss is an [[economic]] loss to the public without any offsetting gain.
+
'''Deadweight loss''' is an [[economic]] loss to the public without any offsetting gain.
  
Specifically, a deadweight loss is the loss in [[efficiency]] that a society suffers as a result of firms setting their [[monopoly]] prices greater than [[marginal cost]], P > MC.  The deadweight loss is due to the loss in value to society of output not produced.
+
Specifically, a [[deadweight]] loss is the loss in [[efficiency]] that a society suffers as a result of firms setting their [[monopoly]] prices greater than [[marginal cost]] (P > MC).   
 +
 
 +
The loss represents the extra value that consumers obtain goods and services that is worth more to them than the price they paid.  For example, you may buy lunch for $10 but you may be so hungry that it is really worth $15 to you.  If the price of that lunch were raised by a monopoly to $16, then you wouldn't buy the lunch and your individual "deadweight loss" from that monopoly price would be $5 compared to the free market.
 +
 
 +
In other words, the deadweight loss is due to the loss in value to society of output not produced.
  
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 
[[Category:Economics]]

Latest revision as of 19:52, August 17, 2010

Deadweight loss is an economic loss to the public without any offsetting gain.

Specifically, a deadweight loss is the loss in efficiency that a society suffers as a result of firms setting their monopoly prices greater than marginal cost (P > MC).

The loss represents the extra value that consumers obtain goods and services that is worth more to them than the price they paid. For example, you may buy lunch for $10 but you may be so hungry that it is really worth $15 to you. If the price of that lunch were raised by a monopoly to $16, then you wouldn't buy the lunch and your individual "deadweight loss" from that monopoly price would be $5 compared to the free market.

In other words, the deadweight loss is due to the loss in value to society of output not produced.