Difference between revisions of "Debate:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
('''yes...''')
('''Post Your Thoughts''')
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=='''Post Your Thoughts'''==
 
=='''Post Your Thoughts'''==
 +
 +
Read the entry on Turkey
  
 
==='''yes...'''===
 
==='''yes...'''===

Revision as of 20:04, March 13, 2007

Post Your Thoughts

Read the entry on Turkey

yes...

It depends how you do you interpret democracy. If democracy means walking around naked,not being interested in where your daughter sister or mom is sleeping tonight , being able to deny the presence of God, Drinking alcholol all night and then staggering like an ill-minded animal on the streets,not respecting your parents by putting them in retirement houses when they become old, kicking out your children out of your houses when they become 18,not knowing your neighbours after living 30 years door to door with them,having disposable marriages , watching two men kissing each other on the street AND yet claim to be socialized and free then the answer is NO.

but If democracy means having free right of speech in the ways that God permits,(by not doing all of above and some others) , being able to question the ruling authority , women's right of voting,equality of women and men in terms of religious moral ethical social conjugal and political rights, respecting each others lives and possessions, and many many more righteous aspects which have already been explained in the Holy Quran, then the answer is Yes.

and if you want to know more about democracy please do read the history of first 50 years of Islam where the complete democracy was introduced to the mankind for the first time.

It is not a matter of me being right or you being wrong, it is a matter between you and your God so contemplate before you leave.

We're not even democratic.

Quite honestly, our system of government is only very loosely democratic(In that we "vote", but that's it-more of a Republic), and the structure of our government was based largely and a series of events. As well, there are forms of Democracy in the Mid-East, such as Iran does infact hold elections(Yes, they do). However, the largest problem dealing with countries such as Iraq is that the people are more or less split into a few prominent groups, with a minority of them actually causing the problems. But bleh, I don't want to go into specifics of Middle Eastern politics right now, so yes and no. Yes, a form can exist(Under the correct circumstance-which is why Iraq is a cesspool of a civil war right now-because of a lack of acknowedgement to the reality of the situation), but not actual democracy.

no...

democracy is likened unto a wolf, a fox and a sheep voting on what they will have for supper. The sheep will quickly lose. democracy is likened unto a man and his dog out in the woods. the man gets real hungry. So he cuts off the dog's tail and cooks it and gives the bone to the dog. the forefathers knew about a democracy. that is why they created a republic.

Comment: I am sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. The United States is a democratic republic. Are you saying that democracy alone is a bad form of government? If you are then I would have to agree with you...to an extent. After a while democracy, alone, begins to falter, as seen in ancient Athens. But building a republic on the foundation of a democracy is a very strong government. If you could please tell me if this was what you were getting at, it would be greatly appreciated. David R

Reply The United States is not a democracy, and "democratic republic" is not the right term either. The U.S. is a republic, a republic is called a "democratic" form of government, but it is not a democracy, and not very similar to a democracy. --TimSvendsen 15:51, 4 February 2007 (EST)

In democracy the people are the government, they propose and vote on the laws, and there is no elcted legislature. A republic is different. A republic is better then a democracy because it recognizes the fact that the people in general do not know enough to govern properly. In a Republic the people choose representatives who are (hopefully) better informed and know enough to do the job. A republic takes the strong points of democracy, (no tyrants, self government...) without some of the problems, (uninformed government, rule by popular opinion) and creates a better form of government. that said, this debate was meant to apply to all kinds of self government, and was misnamed, it should say: "Is it even possible to install self government in a Muslim country." --TimSvendsen 15:47, 4 February 2007 (EST)

Comment

There is a phrase which has grown so common in the world's mouth that it has come to seem to have sense and meaning —the sense and meaning implied when it is used; that is the phrase which refers to this or that or the other nation as possibly being "capable of self-government"; and the implied sense of it is, that there has been a nation somewhere, some time or other which wasn't capable of it—wasn't as able to govern itself as some self-appointed specialists were or would be to govern it. The master minds of all nations, in all ages, have sprung in affluent multitude from the mass of the nation, and from the mass of the nation only—not from its privileged classes; and so, no matter what the nation's intellectual grade was; whether high or low, the bulk of its ability was in the long ranks of its nameless and its poor, and so it never saw the day that it had not the material in abundance whereby to govern itself. Which is to assert an always self-proven fact: that even the best governed and most free and most enlightened monarchy is still behind the best condition attainable by its people; and that the same is true of kindred governments of lower grades, all the way down to the lowest.
—Mark Twain, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Dpbsmith 20:45, 4 February 2007 (EST)

Er, I rather suspect it would be better for everyone if, rather than "installing" democracy, one attempted to instill it. Just a thought.

Some nations are born democracies, some achieve democracy, and some have democracy thrust upon them. Dpbsmith 19:00, 8 March 2007 (EST)

For the sake of argument here, let's presume that "republic with democratic elections" is the meaning of democracy in the question. Anything else is a bit nitpicky, that's obviously what's intended in context. This being said, however, something else makes the question rather hard to answer. Turkey has a large Muslim population, and is a republic. Iran is as well, but is most certainly not. Egypt? Syria? Just what country are we talking about here? Those aren't any more similar than the US and the Netherlands, despite the fact that both are predominantly Christian.

So, this being said, it is more than "possible" for a democracy to exist in a Muslim country, it is a fact of life in Turkey. (And perhaps more, but certainly that one offhand.) If we are speaking of Iraq, on the other hand (and whoever wrote the question most certainly thinking of it)...

Unfortunately, to that one, no. Iraq has been botched terribly, and at this point is likely unsalvageable. There's going to be a long civil war there. I hope very much that I am wrong, but I don't see it ending any other way. I really don't know if it could've ever been salvaged, but at this point I don't think it's possible. Thatguy 00:18, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Yes

Yes, indonesia is the the world's third largest democracy, and the world's largest muslim country. There you go. --WOVcenter 18:15, 8 March 2007 (EST)

We're talking extremist, e.g. Al-Qaeda in Iraq and Afghanistan, where they have a strong foothold and will not abandon it without Jihad. --Hojimachong 18:19, 8 March 2007 (EST)
So, should the original question read "Is it possible to install a democracy in a country that's run by radical mideastern fundamentalist Muslims?". Perhaps the question should have been more precise. And what do you mean by "not abandon it without Jihad"? Indonesians aren't exactly fickle, and I don't think they'd abandon their power anytime soon without some sort of struggle (literal definition of jihad). Oh, and Lebanon and Yemen are middle-eastern Muslim republican democracies.--WOVcenter 18:42, 8 March 2007 (EST)
I guess I should be more precise in my answer too. Installing democracy strikes me as fundamentally naive. The very nature of democracy is supposed to be power derived from the people. Coming in and artificially imposing a democracy strikes me as nearly impossible, especially in such a foreign environment. Yes, democracy is possible in a predominantly islamic country, no, "installing" it probably is an incredibly naive idea. Bush, bleh.--WOVcenter 18:54, 8 March 2007 (EST)

no...

Its not possible to "install" democracy. It is something that must evolve of the people. The question that needs to be asked is is it even right for us to try to install our system on anyone else? Why are we so assured that the way we do things is the only way that they can be done that will work. We came to our democratic system through our own will and process. No other country or people are going to replicate that process so why should they replicate the result? Little Suspicious