Difference between revisions of "Debate:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Panama, Sure!==
+
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]==Panama, Sure!==
 
What shouldn't have been allowed to happen was the transferring of control of both entrances to a Chinese company that is under direct control of communist China. Talk about dirty little deals. I'm sure history will prove it to be one of the dumbest strategic moves by the USA.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 20:46, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
 
What shouldn't have been allowed to happen was the transferring of control of both entrances to a Chinese company that is under direct control of communist China. Talk about dirty little deals. I'm sure history will prove it to be one of the dumbest strategic moves by the USA.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 20:46, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
  
  
 
Defiantly, the Panama Canal is in Panama.  It would have been modern day colonialism if the United States continued to control the Panama Canal.
 
Defiantly, the Panama Canal is in Panama.  It would have been modern day colonialism if the United States continued to control the Panama Canal.

Revision as of 23:03, 1 January 2009

==Panama, Sure!== What shouldn't have been allowed to happen was the transferring of control of both entrances to a Chinese company that is under direct control of communist China. Talk about dirty little deals. I'm sure history will prove it to be one of the dumbest strategic moves by the USA.--Roopilots6 20:46, 20 April 2007 (EDT)


Defiantly, the Panama Canal is in Panama. It would have been modern day colonialism if the United States continued to control the Panama Canal.