Difference between revisions of "Debate:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Panama, Sure!)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Defiantly, the Panama Canal is in Panama.  It would have been modern day colonialism if the United States continued to control the Panama Canal.
 
Defiantly, the Panama Canal is in Panama.  It would have been modern day colonialism if the United States continued to control the Panama Canal.
 
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
 
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
 +
 +
The Panama Canal is nowhere near the contiguous US, right? Seems to me a little bit like colonialism to have one country rule over a bit of land nowhere near their cultural homeland. BTW John McCain was born in a US army base, but the "liberal media" didn't mention that once, you psychopathic birthers. VCS777.

Revision as of 17:41, 26 December 2009

Panama, Sure!

What shouldn't have been allowed to happen was the transferring of control of both entrances to a Chinese company that is under direct control of communist China. Talk about dirty little deals. I'm sure history will prove it to be one of the dumbest strategic moves by the USA.--Roopilots6 20:46, 20 April 2007 (EDT)


Defiantly, the Panama Canal is in Panama. It would have been modern day colonialism if the United States continued to control the Panama Canal.

The Panama Canal is nowhere near the contiguous US, right? Seems to me a little bit like colonialism to have one country rule over a bit of land nowhere near their cultural homeland. BTW John McCain was born in a US army base, but the "liberal media" didn't mention that once, you psychopathic birthers. VCS777.