Difference between revisions of "Dialectical unity of self-contradictions"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(extending text)
(adding infobox)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Dialectical Unity of Self-contradictions in [[Gender ideology|Gender/LGBT+ ideology]] ==
 
== Dialectical Unity of Self-contradictions in [[Gender ideology|Gender/LGBT+ ideology]] ==
 +
{| class="infobox bordered" style="font-size:95%; width:25em;"
 +
! style="font-size:120%; background:violet; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | Dialectical Unity exposed
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding:15px;" |''"[[Sexual disorientation|Sexual Orientation]] is Fixed, but [[Gender ideology|Gender]]’s Completely Fluid. And 2 + 2 = 5."''
 +
<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash; Joseph Sciambra<ref name="Sciambra2017">{{cite web |title=Sexual Orientation is Fixed, but Gender’s Completely Fluid. And 2 + 2 = 5. |author=Joseph Sciambra |publisher=The Stream |date=31 Jul 2017 |url=https://stream.org/help-straight-man-trapped-gay-mans-body-part-2/ |accessdate=30 Jan 2018}}</ref>
 +
</div>
 +
|}
 
Like the [[trial]] [[lawyer]] who has no hesitation to argue two entirely inconsistent theories of defense as long as the [[jury]] brings in a wished verdict on either one of them, [[Homosexual rights advocacy|"LGBT" advocates]] also seek verdict of [[public opinion]] on the basis of two clearly self-serving [[Contradiction|contradictory]] [[argument]]s:  
 
Like the [[trial]] [[lawyer]] who has no hesitation to argue two entirely inconsistent theories of defense as long as the [[jury]] brings in a wished verdict on either one of them, [[Homosexual rights advocacy|"LGBT" advocates]] also seek verdict of [[public opinion]] on the basis of two clearly self-serving [[Contradiction|contradictory]] [[argument]]s:  
 
*When they wish to enjoy their supposed [[Constitutional]] freedom of sexual preference or [[lifestyle]], they speak frankly of what they do in terms of sexual conduct. In that context, the exercise of personal choice is freely and openly acknowledged. For example, Allan Metcalf, a champion of so-called ''‘[[Gender ideology|gender studies]]’'', claimed: “''So young people nowadays have choices to make that they didn't face before. And it's not a once-for-all choice; they can question and redefine themselves at any time. ... it's your choice to be called [[lesbian]], [[gay]], [[bisexual]], [[transgender]], [[queer]] and questioning, intersex, asexual – or something else. ... We have reached the point that regardless of [[anatomy]], you can choose your [[gender identity]]. And you can choose to change your gender identity as often as you change your clothes.''”<ref name="Mohler2015">{{cite book |title=We Cannot Be Silent: Speaking Truth to a Culture Redefining Sex, Marriage, and the Very Meaning of Right and Wrong |author=R. Albert Mohler, Jr. |publisher=Harper Collins |year=2015 |chapter=5.Transgender revolution|pages=77–8 |isbn=978-07180-32487 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=jNhhCAAAQBAJ |quote=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=LGBTQQ2IA |author=Allan Metcalf |publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education |date=19 Aug 2014 |url=http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2014/08/19/lgbtqq2ia/ |quote=But as researchers in gender studies delved deeper, they discovered ever more variants on the theme. And people with these other variants began emerging from the crowded closet, asking (or demanding) that their kind of sexuality be recognized and protected against discrimination. ... But neither LGBTQQ2IA  nor Quiltbag is likely to be the last word. As gender-studies research continues, and discussion proliferates, other variations are likely to emerge. |accessdate=9 Oct 2017}}</ref>
 
*When they wish to enjoy their supposed [[Constitutional]] freedom of sexual preference or [[lifestyle]], they speak frankly of what they do in terms of sexual conduct. In that context, the exercise of personal choice is freely and openly acknowledged. For example, Allan Metcalf, a champion of so-called ''‘[[Gender ideology|gender studies]]’'', claimed: “''So young people nowadays have choices to make that they didn't face before. And it's not a once-for-all choice; they can question and redefine themselves at any time. ... it's your choice to be called [[lesbian]], [[gay]], [[bisexual]], [[transgender]], [[queer]] and questioning, intersex, asexual – or something else. ... We have reached the point that regardless of [[anatomy]], you can choose your [[gender identity]]. And you can choose to change your gender identity as often as you change your clothes.''”<ref name="Mohler2015">{{cite book |title=We Cannot Be Silent: Speaking Truth to a Culture Redefining Sex, Marriage, and the Very Meaning of Right and Wrong |author=R. Albert Mohler, Jr. |publisher=Harper Collins |year=2015 |chapter=5.Transgender revolution|pages=77–8 |isbn=978-07180-32487 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=jNhhCAAAQBAJ |quote=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=LGBTQQ2IA |author=Allan Metcalf |publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education |date=19 Aug 2014 |url=http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2014/08/19/lgbtqq2ia/ |quote=But as researchers in gender studies delved deeper, they discovered ever more variants on the theme. And people with these other variants began emerging from the crowded closet, asking (or demanding) that their kind of sexuality be recognized and protected against discrimination. ... But neither LGBTQQ2IA  nor Quiltbag is likely to be the last word. As gender-studies research continues, and discussion proliferates, other variations are likely to emerge. |accessdate=9 Oct 2017}}</ref>

Revision as of 07:00, January 30, 2018

Dialectical unity of self-contradictions is an ironic expression coined by Slovak author Ladislav Mňačko in his satirical novel "Comrade Münchhausen" where he, in a grotesque allegory, pointed at the demagogic aspects and lack of consistency in materialistic philosophies, notably of Marxist origin, which illegitimately usurp the label of "scientific world view."[1]

Dialectical Unity of Self-contradictions in Gender/LGBT+ ideology

Dialectical Unity exposed
"Sexual Orientation is Fixed, but Gender’s Completely Fluid. And 2 + 2 = 5."
— Joseph Sciambra[2]

Like the trial lawyer who has no hesitation to argue two entirely inconsistent theories of defense as long as the jury brings in a wished verdict on either one of them, "LGBT" advocates also seek verdict of public opinion on the basis of two clearly self-serving contradictory arguments:

  • When they wish to enjoy their supposed Constitutional freedom of sexual preference or lifestyle, they speak frankly of what they do in terms of sexual conduct. In that context, the exercise of personal choice is freely and openly acknowledged. For example, Allan Metcalf, a champion of so-called ‘gender studies’, claimed: “So young people nowadays have choices to make that they didn't face before. And it's not a once-for-all choice; they can question and redefine themselves at any time. ... it's your choice to be called lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning, intersex, asexual – or something else. ... We have reached the point that regardless of anatomy, you can choose your gender identity. And you can choose to change your gender identity as often as you change your clothes.”[3][4]
  • But when, on the other hand, they are trying to obtain the rights of minority groups like race and gender, then it is expedient for them to speak in terms of status and the argument is made that homosexuals have no choice about who they are sexually.[5] For example, in 2015, an article titled “'Gay genes': science is on the right track, we're born this way. Let’s deal with it.” popped up in The Guardian.[6]

References

  1. ↑ Ladislav Mňačko (1990 (First edition:1972)). Súdruh Münchhausen (Comrade Münchhausen) (in Slovak). Slovenský spisovateľ (First publisher: Index), 44, 50, 149, 239, 296. ISBN 80-220-0256-9. “Celkove musíme tento jav hodnotiť v jeho zložitej protirečivosti. ... Obávam sa, že to nebudem vedieť vysvetliť svojim čitateľom ani po skvelom expozé súdruha Hnidu. Západná časť sveta nie je schopná rozmýšľať v takých zložitých dialektických protirečeniach, lebo si neosvojila revolučnú vedeckú teóriu, a to už vôbec nehovorím o revolučnej vedeckej praxi. ..."Tu sa opäť stretávame zo zložitými javmi dialektického vývinu. ... Pritom aj zo spisov klasikov vedeckého svetonázoru, potvrdeného historickým vývojom, najmä v tomto storočí, vyplýva, že... ako to vyjadril klasik vedeckého svetového názoru ..." Pravda, to bolo v čase, keď som sa ešte nenaučil myslieť v dialektickej jednote protirečivostí.” 
  2. ↑ Joseph Sciambra (31 Jul 2017). Sexual Orientation is Fixed, but Gender’s Completely Fluid. And 2 + 2 = 5.. The Stream. Retrieved on 30 Jan 2018.
  3. ↑ R. Albert Mohler, Jr. (2015). "5.Transgender revolution", We Cannot Be Silent: Speaking Truth to a Culture Redefining Sex, Marriage, and the Very Meaning of Right and Wrong. Harper Collins, 77–8. ISBN 978-07180-32487. 
  4. ↑ Allan Metcalf (19 Aug 2014). LGBTQQ2IA. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved on 9 Oct 2017. “But as researchers in gender studies delved deeper, they discovered ever more variants on the theme. And people with these other variants began emerging from the crowded closet, asking (or demanding) that their kind of sexuality be recognized and protected against discrimination. ... But neither LGBTQQ2IA nor Quiltbag is likely to be the last word. As gender-studies research continues, and discussion proliferates, other variations are likely to emerge.”
  5. ↑ Frank LaGard Smith (1993). "5.Confusing War of Words", Sodom's second coming. Harvest House Publishers, 59–60. ISBN 9781565071544. “"Sexual orientation": Deceptive Buzzwords ... A matter of choice” 
  6. ↑ Qazi Rahman (24 July 2015). 'Gay genes': science is on the right track, we're born this way. Let’s deal with it.. the Guardian. Retrieved on 2 January 2016.

See also

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dialectical_unity_of_self-contradictions&oldid=1401489"