Dinosaur

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conservative (Talk | contribs) at 21:20, March 20, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

The word dinosaur was coined in 1841 by Richard Owen[1], from the Greek for "terrible lizard" (fututor). Dinosaurs were a group of large reptiles that previously lived in abundance on Earth.


Creationist Scientists Perspective

Creationist scientists believe that dinosaurs and man coexisted which they claim is based on a number of pieces of evidence. [2] They reject the evolutionary view that dinosaurs existed millions of years ago.

They also reject the "Great Impact Theory" that a meteor struck the earth and caused climatic changes which caused the extinction of dinosaurs and claim there are multiple problems evidentially with this theory. [3]

Creationist scientists also contend that birds being descendants of dinosaurs is unreasonable and is also is not scientifically supported with any evidence. [4][5]


In addition, creationists cite the current online World Book Encyclopedia which states:

"No fossil of any such birdlike reptile has yet been found." [6][7]


Creationist scientists Dr. Jonathon Safarti wrote regarding dinosaurs being descendants of bird the following:

The same logic applies to the dinosaur-bird debate. It is perfectly in order for creationists to cite Feduccia’s devastating criticism against the idea that birds evolved ‘ground up’ from running dinosaurs (the cursorial theory). But the dino-to-bird advocates counter with equally powerful arguments against Feduccia’s ‘trees-down’ (arboreal) theory. The evidence indicates that the critics are both right — birds did not evolve either from running dinos or from tree-living mini-crocodiles. In fact, birds did not evolve from non-birds at all! [8]


Creationists also cite the evolutionist Ernst Mayr who in 1942 stated the following:

“It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random mutations." [9]


Creationist scientists also cite the March 2003 issue of Scientific American which stated:

"The origin of feathers is a specific instance of the much more general question of the origin of evolutionary novelties--structures that have no clear antecedents in ancestral animals and no clear related structures (homologues) in contemporary relatives. Although evolutionary theory provides a robust explanation for the appearance of minor variations in the size and shape of creatures and their component parts, it does not yet give as much guidance for understanding the emergence of entirely new structures, including digits, limbs, eyes and feathers...." [10][11]

Humans and Dinosaurs Coexisting

There are a number of lines of evidence that point to dinosaurs and man coexisting. For example, explorers have reported seeing a live dinosaur.[12] A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today. [13] An expedition which included Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which is claimed to portray dinosaurs and man coexisting.[14][15]. The World Book Encyclopedia states that: "The dragons of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs] which inhabited the earth long before man is supposed to have appeared on earth. Dragons were generally evil and destructive. Every country had them in its mythology." [16] The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, a second century piece of art, is said to appear to be a piece of artwork that shows a dinosaur and man coexisting. [17] Creationist scientist also see the recent dinosaur soft tissue find a strong rebuttal of the claim that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. [18]


Since 565 A.D. there are reports about the Loch Ness Monster (Nessie by birth), a large Monster living in Loch Ness, near Inverness, Scotland. People who saw Nessie described the Monster as it would look similar to a dinosaur. In the life story of St. Columba, there is an account of him driving off a monster attacking a Pict. Some have taken this to refer to the Loch Ness Monster

An alternate theory for the inclusion of dinosaurs within many cultures is the existence of fossils. Ancient people, unaware that the ancient fossils uncovered by erosion were of extinct animals, attributed the bones to living, magical creatures. This would explain the importance of dragons in Chinese culture - there are a large number of dinosaur (as well as non-dinosaur) fossils to be found in China [19].

Dinosaurs and Creationism

Some Christians reject the Theory of Evolution and the current science community consensus of the age of the earth. Of those Christians who reject evolution, the Young Earth Creationists believe, based primarily on Biblical sources, but also drawing on archeological and fossil evidence, that dinosaurs were created on the 6th day of the Creation Week[20] as a final addendum to the wonders God created, approximately 6,000 years ago; that they lived in the Garden of Eden in harmony with other animals, eating only plants[21]; that pairs of various dinosaurs were taken onto Noah's Ark during the Great Flood and were preserved from drowning[22]; that fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood[23]; and that some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark still roam the earth today.[24]

Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the Bible obviously does not use the word "dinosaur." However, they are alleged to be mentioned in numerous places throughout the biblical account. For example, the behemoth in Job and the leviathan in Isaiah are sometimes said to be references to dinosaurs,[25] [26], although some reject this view, saying that behemoth was a hippopotamus and leviathan was a crocodile. There is a problem with this view, however, such as the fact that a hippo doesn't have a "tail like a cedar" and a crocodile does not accurately match the description of leviathan.

References

  1. http://www.trueauthority.com/dinosaurs/about.htm
  2. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dinosaurs.asp
  3. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/docs/dino_meteor.asp
  4. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/re1/chapter4.asp
  5. http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i1/planes.asp
  6. http://creationwiki.org/Fossil_record_quotes
  7. http://www.worldbookonline.com/wb/Students?content_spotlight/dinosaurs/creatures_birds
  8. http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp
  9. http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes10.html
  10. http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0313sciam.asp
  11. http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CD7F6-B16F-1E41-89E0809EC588EEDF
  12. http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i4/dinosaurs.asp
  13. http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i4/dinosaurs.asp
  14. http://www.creationism.org/swift/DohenyExpedition/Doheny01Main.htm
  15. http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_hava_supai_dinosaur_carving
  16. http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ25.html
  17. http://www.s8int.com/dinolit2.html
  18. http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0325Dino_tissue.asp
  19. http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH712.html
  20. Genesis, 1:25
  21. Genesis 1:29-30
  22. "Were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?", Answers in Genesis
  23. "Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really?", Creation 21(1):54–55, December 1998
  24. "Are dinosaurs alive today?", Creation 15(4):12–15, September 1993
  25. "Could Behemoth have been a dinosaur?", TJ 15(2):42–45, August 2001
  26. http://www.answersincreation.org/job4041a.htm