Difference between revisions of "Divided government"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 1142541 by CarlosF (talk))
m (Reverted edits by RSM (talk) to last revision by CarlosF)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Inky binky bonky
+
A '''Divided government''' is one in which the [[President|presidency]] and the [[Congress]] are controlled by different [[parties]]. For example, in the last six years of the [[Clinton administration]], 1995-2001, the presidency was controlled by the [[Democrat]]s, while the Congress was [[Republican]] controlled.
  
daddy had a donkey
+
Many commentators suggest that a divided government may be the best state for the United States, since each party then serves as a watchdog on the other.
 +
 +
Statistics show that the economy grows at a higher rate during divided government than with either party in control of both branches of government. This is sometimes attributed to the [[gridlock]] effect, in which each party blocks the other party's spending. For example, undivided Republican control (2002-2006) under the leadership of [[George W. Bush]] resulted in budget deficits.
  
donkey died
+
Also, in the Clinton administration the years of undivided Democratic control resulted in [[budget deficit]]s, while the years of divided government resulted in a budget surplus, the first significant surplus in the post-[[World War II]] era.
  
daddy cried
+
[[Category:United States Political Terms]]
 
+
inky binky bonky
+

Latest revision as of 19:56, 26 February 2015

A Divided government is one in which the presidency and the Congress are controlled by different parties. For example, in the last six years of the Clinton administration, 1995-2001, the presidency was controlled by the Democrats, while the Congress was Republican controlled.

Many commentators suggest that a divided government may be the best state for the United States, since each party then serves as a watchdog on the other.

Statistics show that the economy grows at a higher rate during divided government than with either party in control of both branches of government. This is sometimes attributed to the gridlock effect, in which each party blocks the other party's spending. For example, undivided Republican control (2002-2006) under the leadership of George W. Bush resulted in budget deficits.

Also, in the Clinton administration the years of undivided Democratic control resulted in budget deficits, while the years of divided government resulted in a budget surplus, the first significant surplus in the post-World War II era.