Difference between revisions of "Domino theory"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(top: Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: ’s → 's)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Domino Theory''' proposed that if a country came under the influence of Communists there would follow a “domino effect” that would spread [[communism]] to other nearby countries.  This theory drove [[foreign policy]] in the 20th Century.  The theory was first advanced during Harry S. Truman’s presidency.  The Domino Theory was a phrase that became popular during the administration of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower. According to this theory, once nations such as [[Vietnam]] fell to communism, other countries of Asia would fall like a row of standing dominos, one after the other, each knocking the next over.
+
The '''Domino Theory''', first advanced during Harry S. Truman's presidency, proposed that if a country came under the influence of Communists there would follow a “domino effect” that would spread [[communism]] to other nearby countries.  This theory drove U.S. [[foreign policy]] in the period between the end of [[WWII]] and the collapse of the [[Soviet Union]], known as the '[[Cold War]]'.  The Domino Theory was a phrase that became popular during the administration of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower. According to this theory, once nations such as [[Vietnam]] fell to communism, other countries of Asia would fall like a row of standing dominoes, one after the other, each knocking the next over.
  
 
==In the 1950s and the Vietnam War==
 
==In the 1950s and the Vietnam War==
  
[[Secretary of State]] Dulles explained the phrase in a 1954 press conference, referring to his plans for the treaty negotiations that led to the creation of [[SEATO]]:
+
[[Secretary of State]] [[John Foster Dulles|Dulles]] explained the phrase in a 1954 press conference, referring to his plans for the treaty negotiations that led to the creation of [[SEATO]]:
 
:"The situation in that area, as we found it, was that it was subject to the so-called 'domino theory.'" "You mean that if one went, another would go?" "We are trying to change it so that would not be the case.... You generally have a whole series of countries that can be picked up one by one. That is the whole theory of the North Atlantic Treaty. When the nations come together, then the so-called 'domino theory' ceases to apply."<ref>The Dulles' Statements on Indo-China, ''The New York Times,'' May 12, 1954, p. 6</ref>
 
:"The situation in that area, as we found it, was that it was subject to the so-called 'domino theory.'" "You mean that if one went, another would go?" "We are trying to change it so that would not be the case.... You generally have a whole series of countries that can be picked up one by one. That is the whole theory of the North Atlantic Treaty. When the nations come together, then the so-called 'domino theory' ceases to apply."<ref>The Dulles' Statements on Indo-China, ''The New York Times,'' May 12, 1954, p. 6</ref>
  
During the [[Vietnam War]], the phrase was heard often. Supporters of the war gave the theory as a reason for staying in the war. The actual phrase "domino theory" though, was usually used dismissively by opponents of the war. They thought this theory was an exaggeration. A New York Times columnist [[mockery|mocked]] it in these words:
+
President [[John F. Kennedy]] endorsed the Domino Theory.<ref>[http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pentagon2/ps31.htm President Kennedy's View of the "Domino Theory,"], News Conference, April 24, 1963. Source: ''[[The Pentagon Papers]]'', Gravel Edition, Volume 2, pp. 818-819.</ref>  During the [[Vietnam War]], the phrase was heard often. Supporters of the war gave the theory as a reason for staying in the war. The actual phrase "domino theory" though, was usually used dismissively by opponents of the war. They thought this theory was an exaggeration. A New York Times columnist [[mockery|mocked]] it in these words:
 
:...two of the favorite propositions of its supporters have been particularly hard for opponents to accept. One is the so-called "domino theory"&mdash;that if South Vietnam fell to the Communists, other nations in the area would topple like dominoes until the United States was thrown back to Pearl Harbor, or perhaps the West Coast.<ref>Wicker, Tom (1967), "Southeast Asia: Dominoes and Master Plan," ''The New York Times,'' February 12, 1967, p. 180</ref>
 
:...two of the favorite propositions of its supporters have been particularly hard for opponents to accept. One is the so-called "domino theory"&mdash;that if South Vietnam fell to the Communists, other nations in the area would topple like dominoes until the United States was thrown back to Pearl Harbor, or perhaps the West Coast.<ref>Wicker, Tom (1967), "Southeast Asia: Dominoes and Master Plan," ''The New York Times,'' February 12, 1967, p. 180</ref>
  
In the end, Vietnam did fall to the Communists, but the spread of Communism was largely contained. In fact, the Vietnamese Army put an end to the Maoist regie of Pol Pot, andd the genocidal campaign it conducted in Cambodia.
+
In the end, South Vietnam and Cambodia did fall to the Communists, and the regime of Pol Pot conducted a [[genocidal]] campaign in Cambodia.
  
 
==In recent years==
 
==In recent years==
  
Before the 2003 [[Iraq war]], [[neoconservative]] theorists suggested that a liberated [[Iraq]] could be a vanguard of [[democracy]]. A democratic Iraq would lead to the fall of authoritarian rulers in neighboring states, and the spread of democracy throughout the Middle East. This has sometimes been called the "democratic domino theory" or the "reverse domino theory."
+
Before the 2003 [[Iraq war]], [[neoconservative]] theorists suggested that a liberated [[Iraq]] could be a vanguard of [[democracy]]. A democratic Iraq would lead to the fall of authoritarian rulers in neighboring states, and the spread of democracy throughout the Middle East. This has sometimes been called the "democratic domino theory" or the "reverse domino theory." Thus far, it doesn't appear to be working.
  
==Real falling dominoes==
+
==See also==
Since 2001, a commercial organization in the Netherlands has organized an event called Domino Day. Teams of volunteers build enormous displays consisting literally of millions of dominos, then topple them all. The displays consist of huge three-dimensional sculptures that often appear to move or change as the dominoes fall. In 2006, the organization toppled 4,079,381 to set a new record.
+
* [[List of military strategies and concepts]]
 +
* [[Mutual assured destruction]]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
==External links==
+
[[Category:Communism]]
*[http://www.dominodomain.com/biggest-domino-project Domino Day] Commercial website
+
[[Category:Military Strategies and Concepts]]
 
+
[[category:politics]]
+
 
+
Waht does Domino Day have to do with the Domino Theory?[[User:Panini|Panini]] 18:36, 1 August 2007 (EDT)
+

Latest revision as of 01:27, December 4, 2019

The Domino Theory, first advanced during Harry S. Truman's presidency, proposed that if a country came under the influence of Communists there would follow a “domino effect” that would spread communism to other nearby countries. This theory drove U.S. foreign policy in the period between the end of WWII and the collapse of the Soviet Union, known as the 'Cold War'. The Domino Theory was a phrase that became popular during the administration of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower. According to this theory, once nations such as Vietnam fell to communism, other countries of Asia would fall like a row of standing dominoes, one after the other, each knocking the next over.

In the 1950s and the Vietnam War

Secretary of State Dulles explained the phrase in a 1954 press conference, referring to his plans for the treaty negotiations that led to the creation of SEATO:

"The situation in that area, as we found it, was that it was subject to the so-called 'domino theory.'" "You mean that if one went, another would go?" "We are trying to change it so that would not be the case.... You generally have a whole series of countries that can be picked up one by one. That is the whole theory of the North Atlantic Treaty. When the nations come together, then the so-called 'domino theory' ceases to apply."[1]

President John F. Kennedy endorsed the Domino Theory.[2] During the Vietnam War, the phrase was heard often. Supporters of the war gave the theory as a reason for staying in the war. The actual phrase "domino theory" though, was usually used dismissively by opponents of the war. They thought this theory was an exaggeration. A New York Times columnist mocked it in these words:

...two of the favorite propositions of its supporters have been particularly hard for opponents to accept. One is the so-called "domino theory"—that if South Vietnam fell to the Communists, other nations in the area would topple like dominoes until the United States was thrown back to Pearl Harbor, or perhaps the West Coast.[3]

In the end, South Vietnam and Cambodia did fall to the Communists, and the regime of Pol Pot conducted a genocidal campaign in Cambodia.

In recent years

Before the 2003 Iraq war, neoconservative theorists suggested that a liberated Iraq could be a vanguard of democracy. A democratic Iraq would lead to the fall of authoritarian rulers in neighboring states, and the spread of democracy throughout the Middle East. This has sometimes been called the "democratic domino theory" or the "reverse domino theory." Thus far, it doesn't appear to be working.

See also

References

  1. The Dulles' Statements on Indo-China, The New York Times, May 12, 1954, p. 6
  2. President Kennedy's View of the "Domino Theory,", News Conference, April 24, 1963. Source: The Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Volume 2, pp. 818-819.
  3. Wicker, Tom (1967), "Southeast Asia: Dominoes and Master Plan," The New York Times, February 12, 1967, p. 180