Difference between revisions of "Essay: RationalWiki admits it has a weirdo, pansie infestation"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(The cherry atop of the glorious sundae of total victory over RationalWiki)
(Gentlemen, I hope you are deeply embarrassed by your kangaroo court. Shame, gentlemen! Shame!)
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 169: Line 169:
 
== Gentlemen, I hope you are deeply embarrassed by your kangaroo court. Shame, gentlemen! Shame! ==
 
== Gentlemen, I hope you are deeply embarrassed by your kangaroo court. Shame, gentlemen! Shame! ==
  
Gentlemen, always remember that in your Chicken Coop kangaroo court, I was not judged by a jury of my peers. One the administrators who voted in your so-called "trial", namely Oxyaena, admits he is "probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences". Gentlemen, you had a madman on the jury! Sad!
+
[[File:Gavel.jpg|thumbnail|300px|center|Gentlemen, always remember that in your Chicken Coop kangaroo court, I was not judged by a jury of my peers.  
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
One the administrators who voted in your so-called "trial", namely Oxyaena, admits he is "probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences". Gentlemen, you had a madman on the jury! Sad!]]
 +
{{Clear}}
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
  

Revision as of 21:21, 1 June 2020

Administrator of RationalWiki indicates their website attracts "weird people"

RationalWiki (RW) is an atheist/agnostic, wiki website.

As can be seen above, on May 17, 2020, the RationalWiki administrator who goes by the moniker DuceMoosolini, indicated that RationalWiki "attracts all sorts of weird people". The statement was made on their Discord channel (Discord is a chat website). See also: Atheism and social outcasts and Atheism and social skills and Atheism and mental illness

Message to RationalWiki editors: Gentlemen, birds of a feather, flock together!
As can be seen above, on 5-24-2020, the RationalWiki administrator Oxyaena wrote: "it's just that i am probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences." The statement was made on their Discord channel (Discord is a chat website).

At RationalWiki, the inmates are running the asylum.

Question: Why is the website called "Rational"Wiki if one of their administrators is probably raging too much to form coherent sentences? There is a lot of irrationality at "RationalWiki". See also: Atheism and irrationality and Atheism and emotional problems and Atheism and anger and Atheism and mental illness
Scientific proof gentlemen that birds of a feather flock together. If your website "attracts all sorts of weird people", then I suggest you gentlemen look in your respective mirrors!

See also: Atheism and social outcasts and Atheism and social skills and Atheism and mental illness
The new atheist Sam Harris said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."(see also: Distrust of atheists)[1][2] See also: Views on atheists

Scientific proof that atheists are mutant weirdos

See also: Atheists and genetic mutations

Of Mice and Men

Theodore Beale wrote: "This would also put Bruce Charlton's Mouse Utopia observations into context, as atheism appears to be one aspect of the nihilistic despair that is a consequence of the increased prevalence of genetic inferiority that results from easier circumstances."[3]

Gentlemen, full exoneration. Just like I expected!

Gentlemen, by admitting your website is infested with weirdos, I hope you realize this fully exhonerates me! Full exoneration, gentlemen! Full exoneration!

Of course, being familiar with the story Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, which also had a bizarre trial, I knew the "Chicken coop" trial would wind up showing the true nature of its participants which it mostly certainly did in spades.

And the icing on the cake, was your website changing its community guidelines so they are more capricious and authoritarian. Total victory, gentlemen! Thank you so much for unconditionally surrendering!

You can't win, gentlemen. Attempt to strike me down, and as always, I become more powerful than you can possibly imagine! Olé! Olé! Olé!

First atheist controlled, mainland China was shown to cause the coronavirus pandemic through their bizarre eating habits and deceit. And now this! 2020 is the worst year in the history of atheism gentlemen, just like I predicted! See also: Atheism and the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic

And one thing that cannot be denied. Your website is bleeding web traffic like a sieve. You have been tried in the world's court of public opinion and been found guilty, gentlemen. So very guilty! Guilty of being pansie weirdos!

Administrator of RationalWiki calls its editors "pearl clutching pansies"

On May 23, 2020, an administrator of the atheist/agnostic website RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked, admitted that its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies".[4]

The above graphic is from Examining Atheism which featured a screen capture and link to Ace McWicked's wiki post at the website RationalWiki.[5] See also: Atheism and mental toughness and Atheism and cowardice

RationalWiki is an atheist/agnostic wiki.

On May 23, 2020, an administrator of RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked, admitted that its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies".[6]

The comment was made on its moderation page.

Should this embarrassing revelation be called "PansieGate"? See also: Atheism and mental toughness and Atheism and cowardice

After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the User: Conservative account at Conservapedia, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground

After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the User: Conservative account at RationalWiki, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground. Administrator Brx essentially admits that blocking him was cowardly. LeftyGreenMario essentially admits that RationalWiki does not have the moral high ground and cedes moral high ground to administrator User: Conservative at Conservapedia. See also: Atheism debates and Atheism and cowardice

Gentlemen, as much as I hate to do it, once more I am afraid I am going to have to declare victory. And remember, its not due to my debating prowess that I easily and effortlessly defeat secular leftists in debate, its due to the utter weakness of their ideology. Olé! Olé! Olé!

RationalWiki administrator admits its website is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrators

On May 23, 2020, a RationalWiki (RW) administrator who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked essentially admits that RationalWiki is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrators. In the above quote, LGM is an acronym for RationalWiki administrator LeftyGreenMario. See: Atheism and groupthink

Atheist Joshua Kelly says atheists are more "docile" and "politically correct" now

In 2015, the atheist author Joshua Kelly wrote:

...since the death of Hitchens: angry atheism lost its most charismatic champion. Call it what you like: New Atheism, fire-brand atheism, etc., had a surge with the Four Horsemen in the middle of the last decade and in the last four years has generally peetered out to a kind that is more docile, politically correct, and even apologetic.[7]

Docile, politically correct and apologetic = Pansie! I rest my case, gentlemen! Olé! Olé! Olé!

A message to RationalWikians from an editor who uses the User: Conservative account

Dear, 𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 and the other gentlemen at an atheist/agnostic website RationalWiki. I just noticed that 𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 posted "a theory" on my user talk page at your website in a desperate attempt to gain my attention.

His "theory" is that I have a strong attraction to your failing website which is currently losing a lot of web traffic. And like all atheistic theories, it is wrong.

Let me explain. Last week a lady by the name of Micah posted something about my beloved after seeing a recent picture of her. As you can see via the above screen capture, my beloved is "beautiful and lovely".

I hope this clarifies my position that the gentlemen at your wiki cannot effectively compete for my attention with "sweet, submissive, lovely, Christian ladies with long, luscious and luxurious hair".

I also hope this clarifies why I rarely think about the topic of homosexuality. I realize some gentlemen at your website wish I had some malady called "homophobia", but if wishes were fishes, we would all have a fry! And remember gentlemen, he who asserts must prove. You never did show that I fear/hate homosexuals and/or homosexuality. And don't think I didn't notice because I most certainly did! Perhaps, this is merely a case of projection. Namely, it is a case of self-loathing homosexuals at your website hating and fearing the sinful, homosexual cravings within them! See also: Ex-homosexuals and Overcoming homosexuality and Homosexuality and health and Homosexuality and the Bible

Gentlemen, do a majority of you have a girlfriend or wife, let alone an attractive girlfriend or wife? I very much doubt it! See: Atheism and social skills and Atheists and physical attractiveness

By the way, when I referred to you gentlemen as "pansies", I was merely quoting the administrator at your website who goes by the username Ace McWicked who said the editors at your website were "pearl clutching pansies". Gentlemen, a prophet of your own called you a bunch of pearl-clutching pansies! Sad!

Gentlemen, as much as I hate to say something to you, I feel compelled to: Olé! Olé! Olé!

Message to Ace McWicked from User: Conservative

The moose hunting Sarah Palin has more machismo than effete liberals/leftists.

Ace McWicked,

I came to your wiki. It is time you man up and come to Conservapedia. If you follow the Conservapedia commandments and Conservapedia's Manual of Style, you should have no problems.

It is my hope that if you spend some time with User: RobS, User: Karajou and User: VargasMilan at Conservapedia, some of their machismo may rub off on you. One of the definitions of machismo is an "exhilarating sense of power or strength."[8]

People often become like they people they hang around. Show me your friends and I will show you your future (see: You’re NOT The Average Of The Five People You Surround Yourself With). It is time you left RationalWiki before its too late.

Remember, the moose hunting Sarah Palin has more machismo than effete liberals/leftists.

Sincerely,

User: Conservative

Christianity's margin of victory over atheism

See also: Christianity and its margin of victory over atheism and Rebuttals to atheist arguments and Atheism vs. Christianity debates and Atheism debates

Jesus Christ said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." - Matthew 28:18-19 (ESV)
Richard Dawkins
The Oxford University Professor Daniel Came wrote to the new atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."[9] See: Atheism and cowardice

Spuriousness of atheism

Napoleon Bonaparte quote

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake - especially if he is weird pansie changing the guidelines to his website. Olé! Olé! Olé! - Napoleon Bonaparte

Sun Tzu quote

"So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak. If your enemy has many weaknesses, then create a lot of articles with the word "and" in them. I can't believe how many "Atheism and...." articles that Conservapedia has! Atheists are such weird pansies.” - Sun Tzu.

See also: Conservapedia articles with the word "and" in them

Douglas MacArthur quote

"The history of war proves that nine out of ten times an army has been destroyed because it has had a weird, pansie infestation.” - General Douglas MacArthur

George S. Patton quote

"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make weird, pansies die for theirs. Olé! Olé! Olé!" - George S. Patton

Dwight D. Eisenhower quote

“Don't join the book burners. Don't think you're going to conceal faults by concealing evidence that they ever existed. If your website has a weird, pansie infestation then man up and admit to it.” ― Dwight D. Eisenhower

Gentlemen, I hope you are deeply embarrassed by your kangaroo court. Shame, gentlemen! Shame!

Gentlemen, always remember that in your Chicken Coop kangaroo court, I was not judged by a jury of my peers.

One the administrators who voted in your so-called "trial", namely Oxyaena, admits he is "probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences". Gentlemen, you had a madman on the jury! Sad!

Contents

The cherry atop of the glorious sundae of total victory over RationalWiki

A quote from an administrator of RationalWiki: "So that would mean that...[User:GiuocoPiano]... gets permabanned by a narrow margin. Spud (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)".

A narrow margin?

Once again, a godless "community" is divided. See also: Atheist factions and Decline of the atheist movement

"If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected. The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." - Sun Tzu[10]

Question: Is there any type of individuals more temperamental and arrogant than atheists? See: Atheism and emotional problems and Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts and Atheism and anger and Atheism and arrogance

Gentlemen, I did not even seek to sow division within your "community", yet that is exactly what happened! Why do you continually engage in self-defeating behaviors, gentlemen? Once again, I subdued you without fighting.

“And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.” - Jesus (Matthew, 12:25)

See also: Atheism: A house divided and in global decline
Hong Kong Christians at Gateway Camp. In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western World Christians as there were Western World Christians.[11] See: Global Christianity

Sour and tyrannical Chinese mainland atheist leaders are trying to suppress these ladies, but they cannot quench their Christian joy.

See also: China and atheism and Atheism and human rights violations and Christian joy, atheist despair and the good news of Christianity

Gentlemen, I laugh at your so-called permaban

There is a gaping hole in your so-called permaban, gentlemen. Once again, you arrogance exceeds your capabilities. As Dirty Harry said in the movie Magnum Force, "A man's got to know his limitations." It is apparent you do not know yours, gentlemen.

A RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker Spud wrote:

"...if you try to edit here again under a different account after you have been permabanned, your new account will also immediately get blocked for ban evasion. It's not as if you'll be difficult to spot. You won't even try to hide who you are. But even if you did try, your writing style would give you away immediately/ The only danger is somebody pretending to be you to take the piss out of you might get blocked as well, since the two are completely indistinguishable. Spud (talk) 05:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)"

Gentleman, I have a working user account at your wiki website now. I am not blocked. Furthermore, there are two editors of the User: Conservative account now. I can easily get the other editor to post whatever I wish at your wiki, but have him merely reword it. I can also vary my sentence length, choice of words and sentence structures. Anytime I wish to add information to one of the talk pages or main spaces of your wiki I can, gentlemen.

I can also have allies rewrite posts to your wiki or have them post at your wiki as well. For example, I have access to Shockofgod's blog. Could it be that Shockofgod is an ally of mine? How many other allies do I have gentlemen? Do I have allies at the Freedom From Atheism Foundation? The truth is that you only know what I want you to know.

You are powerless pansies gentlemen. Always several moves behind behind the most humble servant of God who edited the User: GuiciPiano account - a bondservant inspired by the Almighty who knows the beginning from the end and can think many more moves ahead than you gentlemen. You are mere mortals gentlemen and are clearly no match! Checkmate atheists!

At the present time and for the foreseeable future, like most people, I have no desire to look at your wiki or edit your wiki, but that may change. You will have to be eternally vigilant, but even then you will be utterly powerless. Should I wish to edit your failing wiki (which is profusely bleeding web traffic) rather than contribute material to the myriad of superior alternatives, I will do so, gentlemen.

Face it, gentlemen. Pansies are not able to enforce permabans. Pansies are capable of very little. You can't even stop your website from suffering the loss of great amounts of web traffic, let alone enforce a so-called permaban. Who do you think you are fooling?

"The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit." - Jesus (John 3:8)

"Subtle and insubstantial, the expert leaves no trace; divinely mysterious, he is inaudible. Thus, he is master of his enemy's fate." - Sun Tzu

Furthermore, you cannot stop evangelical Christianity from growing in Europe and in the world (see: Growth of evangelical Christianity). Nor can you stop young earth creationism from expanding swiftly in Europe and throughout the world (see: Global creationism). You cannot stop the world from becoming more religious as a percentage of the population (see: Desecularization). Should the Lord tarry, you cannot stop the anti-homosexuality Abrahamic religions of Christianity and Islam from becoming 75% of the world's population by the 22nd century and the irreligious/nonreligious from being a lower percentage of the world's population than it is now (see: Religion and its projected increase in the 22nd century).

"Men of low degree are only vanity and men of rank are a lie; In the balances they go up; They are together lighter than breath." - Psalm 62:9

"For the LORD of hosts has planned, and who can frustrate it? And as for His stretched-out hand, who can turn it back?" - Isaiah 14-7
Gentlemen, you cannot stop Me nor my resourceful, yet extremely humble bondservant, who edited your wiki using the User: GiuocoPiano account. Apart from me, you are pansies gentlemen. The sooner you face this fact, the better off you will be.

"He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hands cannot perform their enterprise." - Job 5:12
Mr. Secular Leftist, if you're so powerful, then why is Donald Trump president of the United States and leader of the free world? Put that in your so-called permaban pipe and smoke it!

My sockpuppet account at RationalWiki (RW) still has not been found out despite being "permabanned"

The SS Permaban is taking on water.
As of May 31, 2020 1:10 AM GMT, Administrator Spud and his fellow RationalWiki administrators have still not have found my sockpuppet account at their wiki despite imposing a "permaban" upon me.

Gentlemen, how many times have you said I write with a very distinctive writing style? How many times have you said that my writing is incredibly easy to detect as far as it being mine? As much as I hate to say it gentlemen, you are failing my "Where's Waldo/Wally test".

Gentlemen, with your superior atheist intellects, have you determined which account is mine so you can impose your "permaban" with great alacrity? I'm waiting gentlemen - still waiting - and waiting - and waiting. Olé! Olé! Olé!

As of 5-31-2020 12:23 AM GMT, my sockpuppet account at RationalWiki (RW) still has not been found out despite being "permabanned".

RW Administrator Spud wrote:

...if you try to edit here again under a different account after you have been permabanned, your new account will also immediately get blocked for ban evasion. It's not as if you'll be difficult to spot. You won't even try to hide who you are. But even if you did try, your writing style would give you away immediately/ The only danger is somebody pretending to be you to take the piss out of you might get blocked as well, since the two are completely indistinguishable. Spud (talk) 05:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[12]

My RationalWiki sockpuppet account has not been immediately blocked for ban evasion.

I am difficult to spot.

Spud, you teach English as a profession and claim my writing style will give me away immediately. Yet, you cannot detect my sockpuppet account. I suggest you resign your position as a RW moderator/administrator and consider resign being a member of the RationalWiki Foundation Board of Trustees.

Egotistical authoritarians often overestimate their abilities. Once again, history repeats itself.

By the way, as far as sophisticated software that changes a writer's writing style, there was a free program developed in 2019 called Mutant-X and the developers plan on improving the program.[13][14] Good luck trying to detect my sockpuppet account, you will need it!

One of the definitions of the word machismo is an "exhilarating sense of power or strength".[15] Gentlemen, every day you fail to discover my sockpuppet account, I feel an exhilarating sense of power or strength! Olé! Olé! Olé!

Conservapedia attracts people with an extremely high interest in history/math. It does not attract weirdos and pansies!

Gentlemen from RationalWiki, as you can see above, according to Alexa, Conservapedia attracts a lot of people with a "extremely high interest" in history and a "extremely high interest" in math. On the other hand, your website attracts a lot of "weirdos" and "pearl clutching pansies".

Birds of a feather, flock together. Oh atheists and agnostics, feel the sting!

See also

Humor:

References

  1. NEWSWEEK Poll: 90% Believe in God, Newsweek 2007
  2. Roberts, Jessica, et al. (June 19, 2007). "Interview with an atheist". News21. Retrieved on July 30, 2014.
  3. [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/12/genetically-inferior.html Genetically Inferior by Theodore Beale
  4. Administrator of RationalWiki admits its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies"
  5. Administrator of RationalWiki admits its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies"
  6. Administrator of RationalWiki admits its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies"
  7. Uproar Against Dawkins Is Sign of New Atheism Retrogression by Joshua Kelly
  8. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machismo
  9. Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God, The Daily Telegraph, May 14, 2011
  10. [Sun Tzu's 31 Best Pieces Of Leadership Advice], Forbes
  11. Is Christianity taking over the planet?
  12. Administrator Spud at RationalWiki, May 25, 2020
  13. A Girl Has No Name: Automated Authorship Obfuscation using Mutant-X by Asad Mahmood, Faizan Ahmad, Zubair Shafiq, Padmini Srinivasan, and Fareed Zaffar, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies; 2019 (4):54–71
  14. Mutant X - Github
  15. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machismo