Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 649882 by Stitch75 (Talk))
(Removed special mentioning of relativity; Conservapedia's relativity article does not seem to support the original statement. Neither was there a response the the Naval Research article i cited.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref>
 
*[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref>
 
*[[astronomy]]
 
*[[astronomy]]
*[[physics]] (excepting [[relativity]])
+
*[[physics]]  
 
*[[chemistry]]
 
*[[chemistry]]
 
*[[volcanology]]
 
*[[volcanology]]

Revision as of 10:49, 15 April 2009

The exact sciences actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on secular guesses using existing evidence. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.

Topics

Fuzzy subjects

References

  1. For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math