Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 652980 by Stitch75 (Talk))
(clean up)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''exact sciences''' actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on secular guesses using existing evidence. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.
+
The '''exact sciences''' actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on guesses using presupposed naturalism. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.
  
 
==Topics==
 
==Topics==
 
*[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref>
 
*[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref>
*[[astronomy]]
 
 
*[[physics]] (excepting [[relativity]])
 
*[[physics]] (excepting [[relativity]])
 
*[[chemistry]]
 
*[[chemistry]]

Revision as of 18:50, 15 April 2009

The exact sciences actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on guesses using presupposed naturalism. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.

Topics

Fuzzy subjects

References

  1. For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math