# Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"

From Conservapedia

(Removed special mentioning of relativity; Conservapedia's relativity article does not seem to support the original statement. Neither was there a response the the Naval Research article i cited.) |
|||

Line 4: | Line 4: | ||

*[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref> | *[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref> | ||

*[[astronomy]] | *[[astronomy]] | ||

− | *[[physics]] | + | *[[physics]] |

*[[chemistry]] | *[[chemistry]] | ||

*[[volcanology]] | *[[volcanology]] |

## Revision as of 16:49, 15 April 2009

The **exact sciences** actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on secular guesses using existing evidence. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.

## Topics

- mathematics (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like proof by contradiction)
^{[1]} - astronomy
- physics
- chemistry
- volcanology
- seismology
- creation science
- baraminology

## Fuzzy subjects

- evolution
- paleontology
- linguistics
- psychology
- meteorology (especially global warming)
- astronomy (especially black holes, the Big Bang theory)

## References

- ↑ For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math