Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"
From Conservapedia
(Removed special mentioning of relativity; Conservapedia's relativity article does not seem to support the original statement. Neither was there a response the the Naval Research article i cited.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref> | *[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref> | ||
*[[astronomy]] | *[[astronomy]] | ||
| − | *[[physics]] | + | *[[physics]] |
*[[chemistry]] | *[[chemistry]] | ||
*[[volcanology]] | *[[volcanology]] | ||
Revision as of 16:49, April 15, 2009
The exact sciences actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on secular guesses using existing evidence. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.
Topics
- mathematics (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like proof by contradiction)[1]
- astronomy
- physics
- chemistry
- volcanology
- seismology
- creation science
- baraminology
Fuzzy subjects
- evolution
- paleontology
- linguistics
- psychology
- meteorology (especially global warming)
- astronomy (especially black holes, the Big Bang theory)
References
- ↑ For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math
