Difference between revisions of "Fallacy of invincible ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(new article)
 
m (See also: added entry for upcoming article)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''fallacy of invincible ignorance,''' not to be confused with the [[invincible ignorance|theological concept]] of the same name, is probably the simplest [[logical fallacy]].  It consists of simply maintaining one's position after it has been disproved.<ref>[http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Logical%20Fallacies.htm#invincible%20ignorance%20--%20the%20fallacy%20of%20insisting%20on%20the%20legitimacy%20of%20one%27s%20position%20in%20the%20face%20of%20contradictory%20facts.%20Statements%20like%20%22I%20really%20don%27t%20care%20what%20the%20experts%20say;%20no%20one%20is%20going%20to%20convince%20me%20that%20I%27m%20wrong%22;%20%22nothing%20you%20say%20is%20going%20to%20change%20my%20mind%22;%20%22yeah,%20okay,%20whatever!%22%20are%20examples%20of%20this%20fallacy. Logical fallacies]</ref>  As an example, [[homosexual]] activists maintain their position on [[same-sex marriage]] even after having been shown the harms that it inflicts on [[society]].  On the Internet, the fallacy is commonly known as "La la la, I can't hear you."
+
The '''fallacy of invincible ignorance,''' not to be confused with the [[invincible ignorance|theological concept]] of the same name, is probably the simplest [[logical fallacy]].  It consists of simply maintaining one's position after it has been disproved.<ref>[http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Logical%20Fallacies.htm#invincible%20ignorance%20--%20the%20fallacy%20of%20insisting%20on%20the%20legitimacy%20of%20one%27s%20position%20in%20the%20face%20of%20contradictory%20facts.%20Statements%20like%20%22I%20really%20don%27t%20care%20what%20the%20experts%20say;%20no%20one%20is%20going%20to%20convince%20me%20that%20I%27m%20wrong%22;%20%22nothing%20you%20say%20is%20going%20to%20change%20my%20mind%22;%20%22yeah,%20okay,%20whatever!%22%20are%20examples%20of%20this%20fallacy. Logical fallacies]</ref>  As an example, [[homosexual]] activists maintain their position on [[same-sex "marriage"]] even after having been shown the harms that it inflicts on [[society]].  On the Internet, the fallacy is commonly known as "La la la, I can't hear you."
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[Ad nauseam]]
 +
*[[Confirmation bias]]
 +
*[[Deliberate ignorance]]
 +
*[[Mathematician of the University of Pisa syndrome]]
 +
*[[Specious reasoning]]
 +
*[[Willful ignorance]]
 +
 
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Latest revision as of 19:00, July 24, 2020

The fallacy of invincible ignorance, not to be confused with the theological concept of the same name, is probably the simplest logical fallacy. It consists of simply maintaining one's position after it has been disproved.[1] As an example, homosexual activists maintain their position on same-sex "marriage" even after having been shown the harms that it inflicts on society. On the Internet, the fallacy is commonly known as "La la la, I can't hear you."

See also

References

  1. Logical fallacies