Difference between revisions of "File talk:Approx level of technology in Noah's time.png"
From Conservapedia
Ymmotrojam (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Having read the [http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | Having read the [http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
: I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | : I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
::Right. Okay, that's good. I wonder if the poster, Ymmotrojam, agrees!-[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ::Right. Okay, that's good. I wonder if the poster, Ymmotrojam, agrees!-[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I'll defer to you guys, I'm not that kind of history buff :-). I would ask though, maybe the chart is only considering certain types of technology necessary for this type of construction project? Not that the dark ages didn't produce ships, but perhaps in comparison to Egypt, etc, they didn't have the same capability? Of course I have no clue what I'm talking about. If you want to remove it, it's fine with me. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 17:52, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:52, June 21, 2008
Having read the link on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).AShephard 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "dark ages", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. Philip J. Rayment 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Right. Okay, that's good. I wonder if the poster, Ymmotrojam, agrees!-AShephard 10:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- I'll defer to you guys, I'm not that kind of history buff :-). I would ask though, maybe the chart is only considering certain types of technology necessary for this type of construction project? Not that the dark ages didn't produce ships, but perhaps in comparison to Egypt, etc, they didn't have the same capability? Of course I have no clue what I'm talking about. If you want to remove it, it's fine with me. --Ymmotrojam 17:52, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
