Difference between revisions of "File talk:Pb300dpi.png"
From Conservapedia
(→An Objective Review:) |
(→An Objective Review:) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Why exactly is he still on the site? Dig the logo Phil. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 02:14, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ::Why exactly is he still on the site? Dig the logo Phil. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 02:14, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::: Because I don't want proponents of this abomination to think their anti-intellectual religious masturbation is going to be tolerated and accepted. | ||
Revision as of 06:16, March 24, 2007
Shoot, this is a sexy logo. Man, I vote for this -AmesG 01:33, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah! The glaring flaw at the bottom really highlights the farcical nature of this project! --BillOReillyFan
An Objective Review:
- Technical Execution: D-
- Colour/Contrast: F
- Style/Impact: D-
Admit it people. The 20 minute giggle I put together with my kids is the best you're gonna get. -- BillOReillyFan
- Dude, chill. There's a small rectangular flaw at the bottom that I have no doubt Phil can correct. The rest of it, though, is pretty hot. I love it, Phil.-AmesG 01:48, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Why exactly is he still on the site? Dig the logo Phil. Myk 02:14, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Because I don't want proponents of this abomination to think their anti-intellectual religious masturbation is going to be tolerated and accepted.
- Why exactly is he still on the site? Dig the logo Phil. Myk 02:14, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
