Difference between revisions of "Health risks of eating pork"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→Journal articles on the health risks of eating pork) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25119515 The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork], ''Meat Science'', 2014 Dec;98(4):766-72. | *[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25119515 The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork], ''Meat Science'', 2014 Dec;98(4):766-72. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Dr. David Macht study related to toxicity levels of clean/unclean animals in Old Testament == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Pig]]s are considered unclean animals and forbidden to eat under the [[Mosaic Law]] while clean animals were allowed to be eaten (Christians are not under the Mosaic Law). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dr. [[David Macht]], a researcher at [[Johns Hopkins]], found that pigs had higher toxicity levels than clean animals in the Mosaic Law. He reported his findings in the ''Bulletin of the History of Medicine'' Sep/Oct Issue in 1953, ''An Experimental Pharmacological Appreciation of Leviticus XI and Deuteronomy XIV''.<ref>[https://biblethingsinbibleways.wordpress.com/tag/david-macht/ Bible things in Bible ways]</ref> | ||
[[Category: Food]] | [[Category: Food]] | ||
Revision as of 14:31, September 10, 2019
Below are journal articles and other articles which cover the health risks of eating pork:
- Health Risks of Eating Pork, MedIndia.net
- Is there such a thing as healthy bacon or sausages?, The Telegraph
- 4 Hidden Dangers of Pork, Healthline.com
- Disadvantages of pork, Livestrong.com
- Is pork still dangerous?, Psychology Today
- Is pork good for you? It’s complicated, Washington Post
Journal articles on the health risks of eating pork
- Potential health hazards of eating red meat, Journal of Internal Medicine, 2017 Feb;281(2):106-122
- Systematic review of clinical studies related to pork intake and metabolic syndrome or its components, Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 2013; 6: 347–357.
- The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork, Meat Science, 2014 Dec;98(4):766-72.
Pigs are considered unclean animals and forbidden to eat under the Mosaic Law while clean animals were allowed to be eaten (Christians are not under the Mosaic Law).
Dr. David Macht, a researcher at Johns Hopkins, found that pigs had higher toxicity levels than clean animals in the Mosaic Law. He reported his findings in the Bulletin of the History of Medicine Sep/Oct Issue in 1953, An Experimental Pharmacological Appreciation of Leviticus XI and Deuteronomy XIV.[1]