Difference between revisions of "Health risks of eating pork"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→Dr. David Macht study related to toxicity levels of clean/unclean animals in Old Testament (Pigs were an unclean animal under Mosaic Law)) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→Dr. David Macht study related to toxicity levels of clean/unclean animals in Old Testament (Pigs were an unclean animal under Mosaic Law)) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Under the [[Mosaic Law]], [[pig]]s were considered [[Mosaic law and unclean animals|unclean animals]] and forbidden to eat while clean animals were allowed to be eaten ([[Christianity|Christians]] are not under the Mosaic Law). | Under the [[Mosaic Law]], [[pig]]s were considered [[Mosaic law and unclean animals|unclean animals]] and forbidden to eat while clean animals were allowed to be eaten ([[Christianity|Christians]] are not under the Mosaic Law). | ||
| − | Dr. [http://www.creationwiki.org/David_Macht David Macht], a [[Johns Hopkins]] medical researcher, found that pigs (along with other unclean animals under the Mosaic Law) had higher toxicity levels than clean animals in the Mosaic Law.<ref>[https://biblethingsinbibleways.wordpress.com/tag/david-macht/ Bible things in Bible ways]</ref><ref>[http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=13&article=2024 Scientific Foreknowledge and Medical Acumen of the Bible] by Kyle Butt, M.Div.</ref> He reported his findings in the ''Bulletin of the History of Medicine'' (a publication of the American Association of the History of Medicine and of The Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine), | + | Dr. [http://www.creationwiki.org/David_Macht David Macht], a [[Johns Hopkins]] medical researcher, found that pigs (along with other unclean animals under the Mosaic Law) had higher toxicity levels than clean animals in the Mosaic Law.<ref>[https://biblethingsinbibleways.wordpress.com/tag/david-macht/ Bible things in Bible ways]</ref><ref>[http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=13&article=2024 Scientific Foreknowledge and Medical Acumen of the Bible] by Kyle Butt, M.Div.</ref> He reported his findings in the ''Bulletin of the History of Medicine'' (a publication of the American Association of the History of Medicine and of The Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine), September/October Issue in 1953, ''An Experimental Pharmacological Appreciation of Leviticus XI and Deuteronomy XIV''.<ref>[https://biblethingsinbibleways.wordpress.com/tag/david-macht/ Bible things in Bible ways]</ref><ref>[http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=13&article=2024 Scientific Foreknowledge and Medical Acumen of the Bible] by Kyle Butt, M.Div.</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 14:48, September 10, 2019
Below are journal articles and other articles which cover the health risks of eating pork:
- Health Risks of Eating Pork, MedIndia.net
- Is there such a thing as healthy bacon or sausages?, The Telegraph
- 4 Hidden Dangers of Pork, Healthline.com
- Disadvantages of pork, Livestrong.com
- Is pork still dangerous?, Psychology Today
- Is pork good for you? It’s complicated, Washington Post
Journal articles on the health risks of eating pork
- Potential health hazards of eating red meat, Journal of Internal Medicine, 2017 Feb;281(2):106-122
- Systematic review of clinical studies related to pork intake and metabolic syndrome or its components, Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 2013; 6: 347–357.
- The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork, Meat Science, 2014 Dec;98(4):766-72.
See also: Bible scientific foreknowledge and Mosaic law and unclean animals
Under the Mosaic Law, pigs were considered unclean animals and forbidden to eat while clean animals were allowed to be eaten (Christians are not under the Mosaic Law).
Dr. David Macht, a Johns Hopkins medical researcher, found that pigs (along with other unclean animals under the Mosaic Law) had higher toxicity levels than clean animals in the Mosaic Law.[1][2] He reported his findings in the Bulletin of the History of Medicine (a publication of the American Association of the History of Medicine and of The Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine), September/October Issue in 1953, An Experimental Pharmacological Appreciation of Leviticus XI and Deuteronomy XIV.[3][4]
References
- ↑ Bible things in Bible ways
- ↑ Scientific Foreknowledge and Medical Acumen of the Bible by Kyle Butt, M.Div.
- ↑ Bible things in Bible ways
- ↑ Scientific Foreknowledge and Medical Acumen of the Bible by Kyle Butt, M.Div.
