Difference between revisions of "Highly composite numbers"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Further reading: clean up & uniformity)
(this is the earlier page, namely the one to which the prime number page did not link. The prime number page linked only to the composite number page. And the prime number page confounded the term 'highly composite' with 'composite')
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
On the opposite extreme from the primes are the '''highly composite numbers'''. The primes have the least quantity of factors, namely two. A highly composite number is one which has a greater number of factors than any smaller number. In other words, the highly composite numbers each '''''initiate''''' an ''increase'' in quantity of factors over that of any lesser number.
+
On the opposite extreme from a [[prime]] number is a '''highly composite number'''. A prime has the least quantity of factors, namely two. A highly composite number is one which has a greater number of factors than any smaller number. In other words, a highly composite number '''''initiates''''' an ''increase'' in quantity of factors over that of any lesser number.
  
For example, 180 has more factors than any smaller number, or any greater one up to 240. Then, 240 has an additional two more factors than 180. Then, no number above 240 has more factors than 240, until you get to 360, while the quantity of factors of 336 merely ''equals'' that of 240.
+
For example, 120 has more factors than any smaller number, and also has more factors than numbers lesser than 180. 180, in turn, has an additional two more factors than 120. And 180 has more factors than numbers less than 240. And 240 has more factors than numbers lesser than 360.
  
Additionally, the unifying number for all highly composite numbers is 12. This is because of three facts: '''1)''' the ''initiation'' above 6 is always at multiples of twelve but not always at multiples of 6; '''2)''' the initiation span from 12 to 60 is unbroken; and '''3)''' composite equivalence is unbroken from 60 to 120. These three facts together imply a spike graph beginning with 1 and ending with 120, in which there are two sequences of six spikes, in which the ''60 spike'' functions both as the final of the first sequence and as the initial of the second sequence, and the second sequence for which only its first and final numbers are initials.
+
Additionally, the unifying number for all highly composite numbers is 12. This is because of three facts:  
 +
#the ''initiation'' above 6 is always at multiples of twelve but not always at multiples of 6;
 +
#the initiation span from 12 to 60 is unbroken; and  
 +
#composite equivalence is unbroken from 60 to 120. These three facts together imply a spike graph beginning with 1 and ending with 120, in which there are two sequences of six spikes, in which the ''60 spike'' functions both as the final of the first sequence and as the initial of the second sequence, and the second sequence for which only its first and final numbers are initials.
  
 
==Further reading==
 
==Further reading==
http://autismtoohuman.wordpress.com/keys-to-the-highly-composite-numbers-map/
+
https://danielsmathnotes.wordpress.com/144-and-the-bridge-between-two-mathematical-worlds/
  
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]

Latest revision as of 07:28, January 15, 2017

On the opposite extreme from a prime number is a highly composite number. A prime has the least quantity of factors, namely two. A highly composite number is one which has a greater number of factors than any smaller number. In other words, a highly composite number initiates an increase in quantity of factors over that of any lesser number.

For example, 120 has more factors than any smaller number, and also has more factors than numbers lesser than 180. 180, in turn, has an additional two more factors than 120. And 180 has more factors than numbers less than 240. And 240 has more factors than numbers lesser than 360.

Additionally, the unifying number for all highly composite numbers is 12. This is because of three facts:

  1. the initiation above 6 is always at multiples of twelve but not always at multiples of 6;
  2. the initiation span from 12 to 60 is unbroken; and
  3. composite equivalence is unbroken from 60 to 120. These three facts together imply a spike graph beginning with 1 and ending with 120, in which there are two sequences of six spikes, in which the 60 spike functions both as the final of the first sequence and as the initial of the second sequence, and the second sequence for which only its first and final numbers are initials.

Further reading

https://danielsmathnotes.wordpress.com/144-and-the-bridge-between-two-mathematical-worlds/